No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

981 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 37 of 50

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    …in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Gatton v. AP Green Services, Inc. (1998)

    …in his own personal injury action —one which, according to the pleadings, produced a jury verdict in his favor and against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and American Honda Motor Company, Inc., just weeks before he died…

  3. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001 · in the opinion

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …whom an injured plaintiff otherwise could have sought recovery, his or her tort remedy is far from complete. This fact is highlighted by our supreme court's recent decision in Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)

    …is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" (quoting Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)

    …inter alia, upon a theory of design defect. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Defective design may be established under two theories: (1) the consumer expectations test, which asks "whether…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 15, 2023 · in the opinion

    Warrington v. 3M Company (2023)

    …any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'" Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)

    …a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …from asbestos\] was neither known nor knowable by the application of scientific knowledge available at the time of manufacture and/or distribution" of the product. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal. 3d 987…

  12. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …the Court of Appeals and hold the trial court erred by dismissing Lunsford's strict product liability claims [\1104] against Saberhagen. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: SUSAN OWENS, CHARLES W…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Smyth v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a…

  14. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Shaffer v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)

    …equity is to supplement the law where it is insufficient, moderating the unjust results that would follow from the unbending application of the law." Discover Bank v. Owens, 129 Ohio Misc.2d 71, 2004-Ohio-7333…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …to asbestos to members of an employee's household. J-MM argued that the trial court should "similarly find that J-MM owes no legal duty" to Cornelius, because he was not a member of Nathan…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · May 14, 1999 · in the opinion

    Spoonamore v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1999)

    …to evidence that links a John Crane product to Mr. Spoonamore's illness. Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 102 F.3d 1429, 1433 (7th Cir.1996). In order to withstand a motion for summary judgment…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion

    Rabatin v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)

    …Brief at 14. Rabatin does not direct us to any Pennsylvania authority in support of this argument, but does cite to one case from a Florida appellate court, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Corcoran, 679 So…

  18. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)

    … Brightwater; and Owens-Corning Fiberglass. Lorillard contested DeLisle's use of Kent cigarettes. DeLisle testified that he smoked on average a pack of Kent cigarettes a day from junior high school until he enlisted in the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …PRAC. & PROC.§ 3733 (Rev. 4th ed.)(citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014)(in context of diversity removal, only a "plausible" allegation of amount in controversy is required))…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion

    Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)

    …1590. The Act gives the Secretary of Labor the authority to establish standards for permissible concentrations of airborne asbestos fibers. \[17\] The original complaint also named as defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Standard Asbestos Manufacturing and…