No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

889 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 37 of 45

  1. Court case · Montana Supreme Court · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    Orr v. State (2004)

    …general practice of mankind; and the exemption, as one of the attributes of sovereignty, is now enjoyed by the government of every State in the Union." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 81 (1788). \[7\] Engdahl, at 59.…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · June 18, 2010 · in the opinion

    Gennone v. AJ Eckert Company, Inc. (2010)

    …to whether there is: "(1) continuity of ownership; (2) cessation of ordinary business operations and the dissolution of the selling corporation as soon as possible after the transaction; (3) the buyer's assumption of the liabilities…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …such judicial involvement derives from Covil's status as a dissolved corporation in receivership and does not entitle the Zurich Settlement to absolute protection from production in litigation.\[8\] Allowing for limited disclosure under the circumstances…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · March 2, 2010 · in the opinion

    Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ray EX rel. Boyd (2010)

    693 F.Supp.2d 39 (2010) CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. James T. RAY, for the Estate of Harold F. BOYD, Defendant. Civil Action No.: 07-1148 (RMU). March 2, 2010. United States District Court, District…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …citations omitted). \[3\] District courts in this Circuit have followed Ebrahimi's lead on this point. See, e.g., Sperry Associates Federal Credit Union v. Space Coast Credit Union, 2012 WL 4762128, [\2] (M.D. Fla…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016 · in the opinion

    Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)

    …claim cannot be established, by presenting evidence that the plaintiff \does not possess and cannot reasonably obtain, needed evidence.'" (Kahn v. East Side Union High School Dist. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 990, 1003; and see Aguilar…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 719 \["Error cannot be predicated on the trial court's refusal to give a requested instruction if the subject matter is substantially covered by…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion

    Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …to render res judicata inapplicable, although the claims in the federal and state actions were essentially identical and based upon the same facts. In Graphic Arts Internat. Union v. Oakland Nat. Engraving Co. (1986) 185 Cal…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Textron, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (2020)

    …the discussion in Montrose demonstrates, at the time of the Rhode Island ruling in 1991, one California appellate decision had adopted a "continuous occurrence" theory for continuing property damage. (California Union Ins. Co. v. Landmark Ins…

  10. Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · February 16, 1993 · in the opinion

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Fenton (1993)

    …an injured party may still recover the full amount of the judgment from each of the remaining tortfeasors. Kussman, 706 P.2d at 780; National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. Frackelton, 662 P.2d 1056…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Chen v. Volkswagen Group of America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …and Ford's motion was filed on February 16, 2018, merely 4 months after Chen's oral examination, or 10 months after the commencement of this action (compare National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa…

  12. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 31, 1989 · in the opinion

    Falk v. Keene Corp. (1989)

    …their theory of the case, must not be misleading, and must properly inform the trier of fact of the applicable law. Caruso v. Local Union 690, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, 107 Wn.2d 524, 529…

  13. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    Pepsi-Cola v. Employers Ins. Co. (2022)

    …is liable as well for the insured's legal expenses, as well as "any additional costs that the insured can show naturally resulted from the breach." Maxwell v. Hartford Union High Sch. Dist., 2012 WI 58…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · December 27, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)

    …asbestos, Doc. No. 779-8, Viad Ex. E at 126-127; and (5) Cabasug was a member of the plumber and pipefitters' union, which provided publications including warnings regarding asbestos. Id. at 109; Doc. No. 779…

  15. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Reera v. AO Smith Corp. (2014)

    …b), a motion justice may certify an interlocutory disposition as a final judgment if two considerations provided for in the rule are met." Metro Props., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.…

  16. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · November 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    Correll v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co. (2006)

    …the trial court. "\[I\]ssues not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal." Simpson v. Frontier Cmty. Credit Union, 810 S.W.2d 147, 153 (Tenn.1991). We decline…

  17. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · October 30, 1997 · in the opinion

    Green v. General Dynamics Corp. (1997)

    …calculating the average weekly wage of a claimant" with an occupational disease. Id. The only evidence in the legislative history suggesting possible retroactivity is a statement at the public hearing by a union official, George Strutt…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 23, 2019 · in the opinion

    Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Dickson (2019)

    …deposition testimony. Holstein testified the term "bystander exposure" was relevant to Billy's case because Billy was an engineer at Bell and, because of union rules, he was not allowed to touch any tools. As a…

  19. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2012 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2012)

    …could conceivably encounter. Imposing such an obligation would render all the warnings given virtually meaningless: "To warn of all potential dangers would warn of nothing." Andre v. Union Tank Car Co., 213 N.J.Super. 51…

  20. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …Super. 199 (1995) 661 A.2d 814 BARBARA JADLOWSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD P. JADLOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS- RESPONDENT, AND A.C…