767 results for “General Electric”, page 38 of 39
-
Court case · Utah Supreme Court · September 29, 1987 · in the opinion
Tisco Intermountain v. Industrial Com'n of Utah (1987)
…to asbestos products from 1971 until his death. Rather, they spoke only in very general terms. When asked if she had any knowledge of the insulation products used by Tisco, Mrs. Werner responded: "Not an awfully…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…on Decedent's certified Social Security records, which show that Decedent received earnings from "Barnard Burk Inc % \[sic\] Aerojet-General Corp" during each of the first three quarters of 1974—or roughly January through September. (Doc…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 8, 2007 · in the opinion
Roberts v. ACandS, Inc. (2007)
…statute. Id. A. Article I, Section 23, the Privileges and Immunities Clause The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides: "The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 12, 1990 · in the opinion
King v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1990)
…the Raybestos-Manhattan Corporation from 1929 to 1953. The "Sumner Simpson papers" consist of correspondence between Simpson and the general counsel for Johns-Manville during the years 1935-1939. The papers tend to show awareness of…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · July 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (2009)
…a dryer tender and 6695 hours as a dryer stacker.\[19\] The dryer tender was responsible for the general day-to-day operation of the dryers.\[20\] The dryer stacker was responsible for operating the grading…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · August 15, 2012 · in the opinion
Garner v. Ngc Bodily Injury Trust (2012)
…injuries did not manifest within three years of exposure, and thus, would have otherwise been barred. See Jensen v. General Elec. Co., 82 N.Y.2d 77, 84 (1993). The statute provides: the three year period…
-
Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · October 16, 1992 · in the opinion
Luckau v. Board of Review (1992)
…to articulate the plausible interpretations of the specific language actually used by the legislature in section 14, rather than focus on general policy considerations, it would find that section 14 is not ambiguous.\[2\] ANALYSIS Plain…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 10, 2018 · in the opinion
Chevron Oronite Company LLC v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. (2018)
…Aug. 10, 2017): As a general rule, an indemnitee such as Oronite must establish actual liability and the reasonableness of its settlement to recover from the indemnitor. But an indemnitee need only establish potential liability in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…the place of conduct factor does not favor one state over another because the alleged conduct is spread over multiple states. See, e.g, Patten v. General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div., 699 F. Supp. 1500…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Feuerman v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)
…All seven of the plaintiffs in proposed joint trial Group One are alleged to have been exposed, in general, to asbestos at commercial and residential job sites in and around the New York City area while…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 21, 1979 · in the opinion
Caudle-Hyatt, Inc. v. Mixon (1979)
…husband's earnings. It is highly unlikely that the General Assembly intended to restrict the conclusive presumption of total dependency to instances where the spouse had demonstrated that he or she was wholly dependent. Such a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Ridenour v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2014)
…they waive any defense or bar to bringing such a suit. The State of Ohio, the Ohio Attorney General, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, and all defendants in this action agree that the statute…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992 · in the opinion
Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)
…admitted all but one of the books into evidence, apparently under a then existing exception to the hearsay rule for treatises dealing with events of general history. Appellants challenged the trial court's exclusion of the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion
Clemmer v. Thorpe Insulation Company (2009)
…s and its trucks were present at the LBNS almost daily. Ay acknowledged that the federal government's General Services Administration (GSA) was the larger supplier; but Thorpe was the predominant supplier among the outside companies…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2012)
…form of notice Placid was required to give the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants to satisfy due process requirements and ultimately discharge their claims. In general, for unknown creditors whose identities and claims are not reasonably ascertainable…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · November 28, 1978 · in the opinion
Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. (1978)
… and fifth, the legal existence of the first suit. "The general rules above laid down have been held applicable, notwithstanding the fact that one suit is at law and the other in equity. Because a deposition…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Peraica v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2013)
…such as Peraica were at high risk of injury due to high-dose asbestos exposure from removing ACMs from Defendant's boilers (far more than a general awareness of the linkage between asbestos exposure and disease)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 30, 2016 · in the opinion
Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)
…has not met his burden of establishing that this exposure was a substantial factor in causing Suoja's mesothelioma. [\1207] Defendant does not dispute as a general matter that exposure to asbestos caused Suoja's mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)
…of LIA preemption. In Napier, the Court held that "the power delegated to the \[Interstate Commerce\] Commission\[\[4\]\] by the Boiler Inspection Act as amended is a general one. It extends to the design, the construction…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Hegger v. Valley Farm Dairy Co. (2020)
…2012) (holding the term "injury" in the Act encompassed occupational diseases). The general assembly amended the workers' compensation law in 2013 to provide the exclusive remedy for occupational diseases caused by toxic exposure in the workplace…