981 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 38 of 50
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · December 29, 1986 · in the opinion
Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)
…958-959; 275 SE2d 900 (1981) (cause of action accrues when, according to medical testimony, plaintiff was first harmed by asbestos); Neubauer v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp, 686 F2d 570, 577 (CA 7, 1982), cert den…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion
Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)
…other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion
Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Marinari, supra at 1028. See also McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super.1998) (holding plaintiff may bring subsequent action for separate disease resulting from asbestos exposure). Specifically, In such actions…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas · January 16, 2021 · in the opinion
In re United Refining Company (2021)
…3d Cir. 2010), but the accrual test still applies in the Third Circuit for plans confirmed before 2010. Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101, 109 (3d Cir. 2012).\[5\] Under the conduct test, a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Smith v. Wenerowicz (2017)
…2d Cir. 1998); cf. Fontroy v. Owens, 23 F.3d 63 (3d Cir. 1994). To succeed on this claim, Plaintiff first "must show that he himself is being exposed to unreasonably high levels of \[asbestos\]. Second…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 16, 2002 · in the opinion
Wilson v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2002)
…that \[her\] contact with it was of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it." Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614…
-
Court case · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · December 4, 2018 · in the opinion
Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (2018)
…c. 260, § 2D, the so-called asbestos revival statute, see Commonwealth v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 38 Mass. App. Ct. 600, 603 (1995), the Legislature established special time periods during which the [\537] Commonwealth and its…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion
Gilcrease v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. (2001)
…78. The open-ended nature of the 1985 version had made Texas courts too amenable to nonresident plaintiffs whose out-of-state claims were barred by more restrictive foreign time limitations. Owens Corning v. Carter, 997…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion
King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…upon a fair interpretation of the evidence that no valid line of reasoning or set of permissible inferences exist that would permit the jurors to arrive at the verdict reached." (Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Chevron Oronite Company v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. (2019)
…3d 1101 (La. App. 2017) ($750,000 to each adult child of 59-year-old deceased mother); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 878 So. 2d 631 (La. App. 2004) ($250,000 to each adult child…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 18, 2016 · in the opinion
Untermann v. D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (2016)
…Citation.\]" (McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1103; see Rutherford v. Owens-Williams, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather, the plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)
…that they do not have any burden to offer evidence demonstrating federal jurisdiction until the plaintiff challenges jurisdiction in a motion to remand. Dart Cherokee Basin Op. Co. v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547, 553 (2014)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…Court did not create new substantive law in Halphen, but merely compiled and interpreted the law with regard to products liability in Louisiana at that time." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · February 18, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2010)
…State, except in favor of a citizen thereof, who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued." \[4\] In Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 529 (Buttram), we…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…Brooks now moves for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' products liability and negligence claims contending it owes no duty to warn or duty of care to Plaintiffs.\[2\] The Court has addressed by…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · January 5, 2010 · in the opinion
Downs v. 3M Company (2010)
…and has favored a case-by-case balancing." Kettenbach, 822 F. Supp. at 45; see also Abbott v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 444 S.E.2d 285, 290 (W.Va. 1994) (quoting Norfolk & W. Ry. Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 5, 2013 · in the opinion
Pitman v. Crane Co. (2013)
…exist, the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000, and there must be complete diversity between plaintiffs and defendants. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365…