No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

88 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 4 of 5

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2016)

    …and certain court of appeal decisions rendered in its wake: Chavez, supra, 207 Cal.App.4th 1283, Scott v. Ford Motor Co. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1492 (Scott), Collin, supra, 228 Cal.App.4th 582…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …or raw material and therefore are in a better position to guarantee that the component or raw material is suitable for their particular applications." \[Citations.\]' (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. \[(1998)\] 60 Cal.App.4th 1541…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)

    …in brakes sold to end users. Various entities, including Bendix, Ford, and General Motors, purchased asbestos-containing friction material from Abex, [\256] but its most significant business came from Rayloc, which manufactured brake products that were…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141, 122 Cal.Rptr.2d 139 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could be shown in the case of a large corporation except by piecing…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …to individuals who lived or worked some distance away from its plant, citing to Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), a case that was later overruled by Kesner v. Superior…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    …776, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 322.) Because Owens-Illinois was not "an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise" of OCF's Kaylo (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …instructions." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 540 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\] (Hasson), overruled in part on other grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …adjudication on the Sandovals' claims. AAMC requested summary judgment on two grounds. Relying on the holding in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 34 (Campbell), which our Supreme Court recently disapproved…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Ameron International Corporation (2015)

    …one of the many factors to be taken into consideration by the trial judge" in deciding reasonableness of section 998 offer\].) We find Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475 (Adams) instructive…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)

    …offer, the judgment constitutes prima facie evidence showing the offer was reasonable and the offeror is eligible for costs as specified in section 998."'" (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hendricks v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2015)

    …originally been filed in federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); see also Snow v. Ford Motor Co., 561 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir. 1977). As the removing party, Defendant bears the burden of…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Benavidez v. Fluor Corp. (2021)

    …2) \legal cause.'" (Turley, at p. 979.) "\\[I\]f there has been no exposure, there is no causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union Carbide Corp…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Williams v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack OF California (2018)

    …which occurred "during the 1960's through the mid-1980's." \[17\] "A \shade tree mechanic' is someone who maintains and repairs his vehicles himself." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …of governmental safety regulations does not bar an award of punitive damages for egregious misconduct that they are ineffective in preventing. (Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 810 \[174 Cal.Rptr…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …evidence." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 543 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\], italics omitted, overruled on different grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th…

  16. Court case · California Supreme Court · July 3, 1980 · in the opinion

    Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior Court (1980)

    …Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1952) 39 Cal.2d 529, 532-533 \[247 P.2d 707\]; Dixon v. Ford Motor Co. (1975) 53 Cal. App.3d 499, 503, 504-507 \[125 Cal. Rptr. 872\]; Wickham v…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …(Cf. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 525, 553 \[jury's award of 13 times the amount counsel for plaintiffs requested in noneconomic damages and three times the amount requested for…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)

    …408, 421 \[generally, state has no legitimate interest in imposing punitive damages for out-of-state conduct\]; Aguirre Cruz v. Ford Motor Co. (W.D. Tenn. 2006) 435 F.Supp.2d 701, 705-706 \[collecting cases…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Marteney v. Elementis Chemicals Inc. (2018)

    …Furthermore, we would reject it were we to consider it, as ratification through the acceptance of benefits requires knowledge of the relevant circumstances (Johnson v. California Interurban Motor Transp. Assn. (1938) 24 Cal.App.2d 322…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Linsowe v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    General Motors (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1179, 1183.) We begin our independent review of the special verdict with the award of $532,685.37 in economic and noneconomic damages to Sharron Linsowe. The damages award…