No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

90 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 4 of 5

  1. Court case · Oklahoma Supreme Court · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Galier v. Murco Wall Products, Inc. (2022)

    …showing." Ford [\301] Motor, 141 S. Ct. at 1026. The Court noted that indeed, \[it\] has stated that specific jurisdiction attaches in cases identical to the ones here—when a company like Ford serves a market…

  2. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Foreman v. AO Smith Corp. (2015)

    …Reis v. Peabody Coal Co., 997 S.W.2d 49, 58 (Mo. App. E.D. 1999) (quoting Ernst v. Ford Motor Co., 813 S.W.2d 910, 921 (Mo. App. W.D. 1991)). Thus, Missouri procedural…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …of Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …(2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691.) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191, "\[t\]o consider the defendant's entire course of conduct in setting…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Klinger v. Alderete (2013)

    …Klinger, Donadio learned that Alderete was suffering from lung cancer and not mesothelioma. Donadio also stated that the decision in Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), issued on May 21…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)

    …Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 510, 929 N.E.2d 448 (2010); Campbell v. Ford Motor Co., 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 141 Cal. Rptr.3d 390 (2012); and In re Eighth Judicial…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …Appeals recently decided a case in which a brake worker had inhaled asbestos dust from installing the brake products of six different manufacturers. Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co., 91 S.W.3d 387, 393 (Tex.App…

  8. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 28, 2009 · in the opinion

    Honeywell International, Inc. v. Guilder (2009)

    …redact this portion of the letter for use at trial. See MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 832 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Next, we turn to the second issue concerning the exclusion…

  9. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Honeywell International, Inc. v. Guilder (2009)

    …redact this portion of the letter for use at trial. See MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 832 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Next, we turn to the second issue concerning the exclusion…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion

    Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)

    …in brakes sold to end users. Various entities, including Bendix, Ford, and General Motors, purchased asbestos-containing friction material from Abex, [\256] but its most significant business came from Rayloc, which manufactured brake products that were…

  11. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Baumgartner v. American Standard, Inc. (2015)

    …C. § 2315.21(B). Here, there is clearly a conflict as to the assessment of punitive damages. See e.g., Dodson v. Ford Motor Co., 2006 WL 2642199, at [\2] (R.I. Super. Sept. 5, 2006…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…

  13. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)

    …and consequently cannot have an error rate."); Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1224-1225 (D.Utah 2013) ("every exposure" opinion excluded under Daubert as not testable and having no known error…

  14. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …in section 402A of the Second Restatement. Id. at 155. In making this determination, the Fourth District relied on Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), which held that "\…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …of other suppliers. Id. at 209 (footnote omitted). \[5\] We will briefly comment upon an additional matter. On June 29, 2012, this Court filed its opinion in Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., \_\_\_ Md. App. \_\_\_, No. 536…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986 · in the opinion

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …of the product he has produced rather than his behavior and, therefore, strict liability does not sound in negligence. (citations omitted). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)

    …is scientifically impossible to separate out each exposure and say exposure A contributed to the person's total dose but exposure B did not." Further, they rely on Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)

    …232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995)); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32, 46 (Tex. 2007). Thus…

  19. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)

    …702. Thus, the trial court should not accept the expert's opinion at face value; it must independently [\179] examine and evaluate the reliability of each expert's opinion. Walker v. Ford Motor Co., 8th Dist.

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …JJ. John T. Enoch and John Amato, IV, with whom were Goodman, Meagher & Enoch on the brief, for appellants. F. Ford Loker, with whom were Robert E. Scott, Jr., Daniel W. Whitney and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes…