90 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · November 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Orton (2021)
…underpinnings" and "correctness of the expert's conclusions" may affect any ultimate determination on the merits, but do not govern admissibility. See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718-19 (7th Cir. 2000)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion
Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)
…in brakes sold to end users. Various entities, including Bendix, Ford, and General Motors, purchased asbestos-containing friction material from Abex, [\256] but its most significant business came from Rayloc, which manufactured brake products that were…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…and sold by others. The circuit court granted the pump makers summary judgment. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that under its earlier decision in Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, and following courts in…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · August 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Edwards v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2022)
625, 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (2016)); see also Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015) ("Also referred to as \any exposure' theory, or \single fiber' theory…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)
…and consequently cannot have an error rate."); Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 950 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1224-1225 (D.Utah 2013) ("every exposure" opinion excluded under Daubert as not testable and having no known error…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · May 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Thurmon v. Georgia Pacific, LLC (2016)
…component parts of its industrial valves. Both of these arguments fail. Georgia courts recognize a cause of action for injuries sustained on account of a manufacturer's negligent product design. See Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 3, 1996 · in the opinion
Held v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (1996)
…La.1990). This is true no matter how small the chances of the party opposing the motion to ultimately prevail appear to be. Dearie v. Ford Motor Co., 583 So.2d 28 (La. App. 5 Cir…
-
Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion
Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)
…second, that such assumption of the risk is a "form of contributory negligence." The first principle finds wide support in the authorities. See Henderson v. Ford Motor Co., 519 S.W.2d 87, 90 (Tex.1974)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…of governmental safety regulations does not bar an award of punitive damages for egregious misconduct that they are ineffective in preventing. (Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 810 \[174 Cal.Rptr…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)
…original asbestosis suit. Given our current state of medical knowledge, however, it is not even possible to determine with certainty which disease stemmed from what asbestos exposure(s). See Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. \…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Krumwiede v. Tremco, Inc. (2020)
…is scientifically impossible to separate out each exposure and say exposure A contributed to the person's total dose but exposure B did not." Further, they rely on Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 637 Pa. 625…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)
…the "single fiber" theory, and the "each and every exposure" theory. See, e.g., Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015). \[12\] Ms. Barabin takes issue with…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…702. Thus, the trial court should not accept the expert's opinion at face value; it must independently [\179] examine and evaluate the reliability of each expert's opinion. Walker v. Ford Motor Co., 8th Dist.
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)
…factor' in the duty assessment under Pennsylvania law." (citation omitted)); Cf. Miller v. Ford Motor Co., 740 N.W.2d 206, 209-10 (Mich. 2007) (holding the owner of "property on which asbestos-containing products were…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · July 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Font v. Union Carbide Corp. (2016)
…complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or unless the \failure to give the instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury.'" Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So.2d 103, 106 (Fla…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 8, 2007
State EX rel. Pilkington N. AM. v. Indus. Comm. (2007)
…and Settlement Credits Worksites: Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant; Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and Thermopane Plant 9), Rossford laborer, furnace tender, and crew leader Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and Thermopane…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2019)
…Court, E.D. Louisiana. Cary Gomez, Chucky R. Gomez, Norma C. Gomez, Brittany G. Ford & Chance J. Gomez, Plaintiffs, represented by Damon R. Pourciau, Ardoin Law Firm, Scott Michael Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua LLC & Stephanie Moore Hartman…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion
Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)
…DeGulis, Hoffmann & Lombardi, L.L.P., and Stephen H. Daniels, for appellant. DONALD R. FORD, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} Appellant, John Crane, Inc., appeals from the May 13, 2005 judgment entry of the Trumbull County Court of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…Court, E.D. Louisiana. Cary Gomez, Chucky R. Gomez, Norma C. Gomez, Brittany G. Ford & Chance J. Gomez, Plaintiffs, represented by Damon R. Pourciau, Ardoin Law Firm, Scott Michael Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua LLC & Stephanie Moore Hartman…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 5, 1984 · in the opinion
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…Robert E. Scott, Jr., Bruce R. Parker, Daniel W. Whitney, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Michael B. Mann, Merriman & Mann, James R. Eyler, Miles & Stockbridge, Michael E. Marr, Baltimore…