123 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 7
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)
…will probably have a decreased purchasing power at the time of the dollar's theoretical use in the future. In general, plaintiffs will try to project lower future interest rates than will be suggested by defendants…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
Jun. 9, 2011) (TRANSCRIPT). \[27\] See, e.g., Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002). \[28\] In re: Asbestos Litig. (Bowser), C.A. No. N10C-05-104 ASB (Jun. 3…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · May 20, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Specialty Products Holding Corp. (2013)
…Tr. 1/11/13 at 91:16-21 (Vasquez). Dr. Vasquez also considered whether Debtors' experience is in line with general trends in asbestos litigation. Tr. 1/11/13 at 91:22-92:13 (Vasquez). That…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…rationale for why it should can be gleamed from the California law cited by the plaintiff. California follows the general rule of no duty to warn, but recognizes exceptions to that doctrine.\[13\] In Sherman v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · October 24, 2019
Evans v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)
…overruled its objections to the magistrate judge's ruling that plaintiff's Navy procurement expert was qualified. General maritime law and state survival statutes can supply survival damages where an asbestos injury is indivisible across the…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 31, 2011
Foucha v. CertainTeed Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
…law, a plaintiff must show exposure to asbestos from the specific defendant's product; a belief based on general "common knowledge" that shingles contained asbestos, against unrebutted evidence that the particular product was asbestos-free, is…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)
…upon by Captain Moore extend to JCI because Captain Moore testified that "these documents are instructive for the general purpose of determining what the Navy's attitude towards warnings was at any particular point in time.…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)
…Liability. The ALI drafting committee and general members of the ALI approved the substance of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (with the exception of two comments not relevant here) in 2005. The…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019 · in the opinion
Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…other words, an adequate warning might have allowed someone to avoid a risk of mesothelioma had there been an adequate warning. Because Ford's products were defective in that general way, and because Mr. Knecht was…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · March 20, 2023 · in the opinion
In re Reinz Wisconsin Gasket, LLC (2023)
…The parties should also submit a proposed appointment order. The Court will select a receiver from the parties' list and enter an order appointing the receiver. "As a general rule, costs and expenses of a receivership…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 13, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2021)
…or the vote accepting the Plan).\[65\] Rather, he relies on a one page general "Attorney Agreement" which provides that Mr. Bevan can vote on behalf of his client in a bankruptcy case filed by any…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · January 26, 2004 · in the opinion
In re ACandS, Inc. (2004)
…DE, John L. Horan, Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson, Lincoln, NE, Kartar S. Khalsa, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Steven K. Kortanek, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, Wilmington, DE, Carl N…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Leathers v. Pneumo Abex (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…in Rhode Island.\[1\] The Court noted that "this test comports with \[their\] Supreme Court's general causation jurisprudence and fairly balances the interests of plaintiffs and defendants."\[2\] The Sweredoski decision is a 2013 decision…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Vocciante v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…Id. at ¶ 28) Accordingly, plaintiffs assert claims for strict liability, negligence, false representation, violation of the Jones Act, violation of general maritime law, loss of consortium, wrongful death, and seek, inter alia, punitive damages. (Id. at…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Air Prods. and Chemicals (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…facts for a jury to infer that asbestos was inherent in Defendant's premises. Even assuming that under a premise owner's general duty, which the Smith court expanded to include that a land owner "had…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · May 19, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…l\]ike a number of other jurisdictions, Ohio follows the general rule that a manufacturer does not have a duty to warn of adjacent parts supplied by a third party, the so-called bare metal defense…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 23, 1983 · in the opinion
Nutt v. AC & S., Inc. (1983)
…claims of mental anguish asserted by the plaintiff-wives are alleged in the amended complaints in broad and general language but are actually of two distinct types: mental anguish resulting from the witnessing of the physical…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)
…the Plan B Settlement as the default, or fallback, settlement in the event that the court could not approve the Plan A Settlement.\[11\] Debtors' former General Counsel, John Gasparovic, testified that during "the negotiations of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…