No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

112 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 6

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · October 26, 1993 · in the opinion

    State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. WR Grace & Co. (1993)

    …the design and construction of improvements to real property ... so that they and their [\1059] families are not liable all their lives and beyond lives and into the graves. Eighty-First Illinois General Assembly, House Proceedings…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    Flanders v. California Coastal Communities (2005)

    …There are, however, four exceptions to this general rule: "(1) where there is an express or implied agreement of assumption; (2) where the transaction amounts to a consolidation or merger of the purchaser or seller corporation;…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …Arnold Brody, who intend to testify that, in general, each and every exposure to asbestos products results in injury to the person so exposed. Krik believes that this testimony will help him to establish that his…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Startley v. Welco Mfg. Co. (2017)

    …¶ 38 Choice of Law ¶ 39 In general, "the local law of the State where the injury occurred should determine the rights and liabilities of the parties, unless \[another state\] has a more significant relationship with the…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 10, 2010 · in the opinion

    Simpkins v. CSX Corp. (2010)

    …required the New Jersey Supreme Court to apply general principles of duty similar to Illinois's to circumstances nearly identical to those present in the instant case. Satterfield involved a 25-year-old woman who died…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …person's expertise. Generalized knowledge of a particular subject will not necessarily enable an expert to testify as to a specific subset of the general field of the expert's knowledge. Martinez v. Sakurai Graphic Sys…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …even though both individuals deny it. In any event, plaintiffs do not rely solely upon parallel action to prove their cases. A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994 · in the opinion

    Keystone Steel and Wire Co. v. Costa (1994)

    …689, 485 N.E.2d 500.) In general, a new trial on the question of damages only is appropriately granted where (1) the jury's verdict on the question of liability is amply supported by the…

  10. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …could look beyond these problems, I still would not agree with the majority's decision. A defendant is liable as a conspirator where he understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…

  11. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · November 4, 2015 · in the opinion

    Folta v. Ferro Engineering (2015)

    … 34 Thus, the General Assembly intended to provide an absolute definitive time period within which all occupational disease claims arising from asbestos exposure must be brought. Since James's last employment exposure to asbestos was in…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 14, 2022 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. Venta Corp. (2022)

    …Associates (SIPA). At that time, the defendant Robert Boey was a general partner of both ABC and SIPA. None of the defendants informed Daniels that the debris he was directed to remove contained asbestos. In 2017…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)

    …The agent stated that Lamorak was "binding the primary general liability program using the \ \ \ SIR." The document supports the [\141] inference that the agent and Kone believed Lamorak had agreed to issue primary insurance subject to…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Shipley v. Hoke (2014)

    …at 434-35. (We note that the General Assembly has since codified the citation lien in section 2-1402(m) of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2-1402(m) (West 2010) (added by Pub. Act 88…

  15. State law · Illinois

    Illinois Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …time; remanded to replead); In re Estate of Holmes, 2011 IL App (4th) 100462 (take-home verdict reversed: danger not foreseeable at the time). This example is general. Every case depends on the diagnosis, exposure history…

  16. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 27, 1988 · in the opinion

    Blazek v. Nicolet, Inc. (1988)

    …We disagree. • 1 The general intent of statutes of repose is to "terminate the possibility of liability after a defined period of time, regardless of a potential plaintiff's lack of knowledge of his cause of…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 1993 · in the opinion

    Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1993)

    …under Illinois common law. However, Fahner does not represent that conclusion because it involved a statutory enforcement action brought by the Illinois Attorney General pursuant to the Illinois Antitrust Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 38…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …a)(1).\[1\] Plaintiff now seeks remand of this matter, arguing that the statute does not apply. STANDARD In general, any civil action filed in state court may be removed to the district court if this…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)

    …product." Id. (quoting Calles, 309 Ill.Dec. 383, 864 N.E.2d at 264) (citing Sobczak v. General Motors Corp., 373 Ill.App.3d 910, 312 Ill.Dec. 682, 871 N.E.2d 82, 94 (2007…

  20. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 12, 1996 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Keene Corp. (1996)

    …pleadings shall be according to the rules." 735 ILCS 5/2-201(a) (West 1994). General jurisdiction is invoked in the trial court when an action is filed and a summons is issued and served upon…