No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

99 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 5

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 27, 1990 · in the opinion

    Jenkins v. Johns-Manville Products (1990)

    …BROCHIN. Lawrence G. Moncher, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent-appellant Commissioner Of Labor, and respondent-cross-appellant in A-5659-86T7 (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Lawrence G…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 28, 2021 · in the opinion

    Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (2021)

    …Ibid. It held that, because the defendants had general knowledge of the rollover problem, they "had notice of potential relevance to this and other litigation involving their product." Ibid. Because the evidence of destruction of raw…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989 · in the opinion

    Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)

    …in the evaluation of the damage claim against the defendant. In this way, to the extent that men can achieve justice through general rules, a just balance of the warring interests is accomplished. \[Citations omitted\]. Cf…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · March 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kirkwood v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2020)

    …avoid jurisdiction." In re Nazi Era Cases, 153 F. App'x at 823. While product line successor liability\[2\] is an exception to the general rule of successor non-liability, "no court, appears to have addressed ..…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    N RE Ltl Management, LLC (2022)

    …non-debtor third party, does not extend to "joint tortfeasors." Also discussed, there exists an exception to this general rule in that the stay can be extended when the circumstances so warrant. Thus, even assuming direct…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · February 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re GI Holdings, Inc. (2005)

    …Donnellon, Cincinnati, OH, Co-Counsel for C. Judson Hamlin, the Legal Representative of Present and Future Holders of Asbestos-Related Demands. Office of the Attorney General, State of Illinois, by Marilyn A. Kueper, Springfield, IL, Chief…

  7. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 22, 1988 · in the opinion

    Millison v. EI du Pont de Nemours (1988)

    …Ed. 610, 617 (1939); U.S. v. Trotter, 529, F.2d 806 (3d Cir.1976); State v. General Restoration Co., 42 N.J. 366, 375 (1964); State v. Sherwin, 127 N.J. Super. 370 (App.Div…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 30, 1977 · in the opinion

    Bush v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation (1977)

    …298 (1976), construed the 1974 amendment as retroactive in nature because of its beneficent purpose and the general rule of liberally interpreting the Workers' Compensation Act. It also held that such retroactivity did not impair any…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …after which defendant Bell withdrew its appeal. In addition to its general argument that the case before us is one of great public importance, Johns-Manville's petition urges that the Appellate Division's determination runs…

  10. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · October 24, 2017 · in the opinion

    Continental Insurance Company v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2017)

    …FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, FREMONT INDEMNITY COMPANY (f/k/a INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY), GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION, HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY (f/k/a INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY), LEXINGTON INSURANCE…

  11. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · January 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2007)

    …of asbestos claims including: (i) all of the Debtors' interest in asbestos insurance coverage provided in their general liability insurance (ii) 3,800,000 new shares of Congoleum Class A common stock (but only if the…

  12. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)

    …625 A.2d 1110). B. Applying those general principles of tort liability to the facts of this case, the risk of injury to someone like Eleanor Olivo is one that should have been foreseeable to Exxon…

  13. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion

    Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    …insufficient showing of notice of the many Saranac documents which the jury was led to believe were known to Owens-Corning which still marketed Kaylo with no warnings to the end users. As a general rule…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 31, 1985 · in the opinion

    Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec v. Am. Home Assur. Co. (1985)

    …While all have held for the insureds, most commonly in declaratory judgment actions seeking to clarify the parties' rights and obligations under Comprehensive General Liability (CGL) policies, the courts have offered conflicting interpretations of the manner…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gea Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. v. First State Insurance Company (2023)

    …June 24, 2019) (the "Thornton Action"). Defendants, or their predecessors, issued certain primary or excess general liability policies (the "Policies") to GEA Mechanical's predecessor, Centrico, Inc. ("Centrico"),\[2\] covering various periods from May 15, 1979…

  16. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    …theory of non-identification liability is acceptable in New Jersey. \[9\] The court "reserve\[d\] decision on the general appropriateness of including products with different degrees of risk in a market-share analysis." 116 N.J…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Thomas-Fish v. Aetna Steel Products Corp. (2019)

    …¶ 20) It is undisputed for purposes of the instant motion that Sonic Industries is not subject to general jurisdiction in the State of New Jersey. Sonic Industries is incorporated in California and maintains its principal place…

  18. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)

    …In New Jersey, however, the common law of premises liability "has undergone transition toward \a broadening application of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.'" Sussman, supra, 373 N.J…

  19. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · April 18, 2023 · in the opinion

    In re Ltl Management, LLC (2023)

    …398 F.3d 1098, 1100 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that lower court had jurisdiction to determine whether the automatic stay of the Texas bankruptcy court applied to the Attorney General's suit). Therefore, the instant matter…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2023)

    …2015, are "general value-oriented statements" that do not specifically address the Talc Products or make any specific claims about the Company's quality assurance process and procedures, and as such those statements were dismissed by…