No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

79 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 4

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …No. 20\]. The same analysis is true for the Plaintiffs' claims based on the duty to warn. As the Fourth Circuit explained in Baughman v. General Motors Corporation, 780 F.2d 1131, 1132-33 (4th Cir…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · March 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Young v. Agco Corporation (2014)

    …the Court need not conduct a de novo review where a party makes only "general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …477 U.S. at 257. The moving defendants principally challenge the plaintiffs' evidence of exposure and causation as a general matter without distinguishing between the causes of action. In a case where the plaintiff developed asbestosis…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · July 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Bell v. American International Industries (2021)

    …Resp. (Doc. 313) at 8.) "Under the general successor liability rule, a corporation which purchases all or substantially all of the assets of another corporation is not liable for the transferor's liabilities." Joyce Farms, LLC…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · May 10, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re Bestwall LLC (2021)

    …argues that the Court should not grant an interlocutory appeal either, because the issue raised is not a controlling question of law and is instead the application of a general rule to the case facts, (Doc…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Harris v. Ajax Boiler, Inc. (2014)

    …the overhaul of any of the defendants' boilers. Plaintiff has no evidence to show that defendants' boilers required the use of an asbestos-containing cement, in general, or Narcolite in particular, to affect a proper repair…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)

    …publication databases that she had access to as part of her position as a nurse. Plaintiff recalled that researching WDPM led her to "general mesothelioma sites that had discussion about asbestos and causes." (J. Ratcliff Dep…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …he was "pretty sure" there were "some Anchor\[ \]" valves there. (See ECF No. 312-1 at 23.) As a general matter, Mr. Draughn testified that "if a valve needed replacing" a supervisor "could send \[a mechanic…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 22, 2023 · in the opinion

    The Manville Trust Matching Claimants v. Dbmp, LLC (2023)

    …is "a failure or refusal, either express or implicit, actually to exercise discretion, deciding instead as if by general rule, or even arbitrarily, as if neither by rule nor discretion." Jacobson, 6 F.3d at 239…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …Gen. Stat. Ann. § 1D-5(7) (West 2018). A general awareness of danger is not enough to establish a conscious disregard of a known duty. Lee v. CertainTeed Corp., No. 5:13-CV-826-FL, 2015…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 27, 2023 · in the opinion

    Non-Party Certain Matching Claimants v. Aldrich Pump LLC (2023)

    …A. Likelihood of Success on the Merits Appellants have established their appeal is likely to succeed on the merits. Although there is a general presumption of openness of judicial proceedings, "under appropriate circumstances anonymity may, as…

  12. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Robbins v. Wake County Bd. of Educ. (2002)

    …a greater risk for contracting mesothelioma than the public generally, and that mesothelioma is not an ordinary disease of life to which the general public is equally exposed. Defendant appeals. Defendant argues on appeal that the…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas (2019)

    …P. 12(b)(7)). The decision under Rule 19(a) has to be made in terms of the general policies of avoiding multiple litigation, providing the parties with complete and effective relief in a single action…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 15, 2022 · in the opinion

    Penegar v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2022)

    …1982). De novo review is also not required "when a party makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id. Similarly…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 18, 2018 · in the opinion

    Vanhoy v. American International Industries (2018)

    …to understate the hazards of asbestos exposure, all for their own profit and gain, Defendant \[Metropolitan Life Insurance Company\] willfully, wantonly, and with malice in calculated disregard for the welfare of the general public. . . . (Am. Compl…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 7, 2018 · in the opinion

    Bell v. American International Industries (2018)

    …DENIED. \[1\] Neither party has addressed whether res judicata might apply in this case. "\[A\]s a general matter, a district court should not sua sponte consider an affirmative defense that the defendant has the burden…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 4, 2020 · in the opinion

    Zurich American Insurance Company v. Covil Corporation (2020)

    …time the insured was uninsured, or whether some other allocation is appropriate. 3) The USF&G Dates of Coverage Issue: Whether USF&G provided general liability insurance policies to Covil from 1954 through 1964; and 4)…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …. which of Defendants' experts offer the challenged general causation opinion." (Id. at 30.) The Court did not have the benefit of knowing which experts seek to testify that exposure to vehicle friction products categorically cannot cause…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · September 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Richardson v. Pcs Phosphate Company, Inc. (2016)

    …expenses and that its refusal to fulfill this obligation has forced Medicare to make all mesothelioma-related payments on O'Connor's behalf. These general allegations of injury suffice at the early state of litigation. Moreover…