96 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
Rahmes v. Adience Inc. (2007)
…contracting or selling or installation business? {¶ 23} "A. Yes. {¶ 24} "Q. And general idea, how far outside of Cincinnati, Cincinnati area would some of these operations take place? {¶ 25} "A. Do you have a time framework…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion
Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)
…Decedent reasonably did not know the purpose of the questioning. Perhaps Decedent could only have reasonably been expected to know of general impacts of the exposure to his health, but not that it could cause cancer…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)
…sua sponte order Owens-Illinois, Inc. dismissed from this appeal. \[3\] The General Assembly effectively overruled paragraph two of the syllabus to Horton with the adoption of R.C. 2307.96(B), effective to cases filed…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 2007 · in the opinion
Varner v. Ford Motor Co. (2007)
…P.O. Box 9900, Brookpark, Ohio 44142, Attorneys for appellees for ford Motor Company. Marc Dann, Ohio Attorney General, Dawn M. Tarka, Assistant Attorney General, 615 West Superior Avenue, 11th Floor, Cleveland, Ohio 44113, for Bureau…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · October 14, 1987 · in the opinion
Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1987)
…it is important to understand that both alternative liability and market-share liability are exceptions to the general rule that a plaintiff has to prove an injury was caused by the negligence of a particular defendant…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion
Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)
…of asbestos dust. On February 27, 2003, appellee filed a claim for employer intentional tort and wrongful death against appellant, GATX Corporation ("GATX"), General American Transportation Corporation, the Gage Company, I.U. North America, Inc., Garlock…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)
…the suit, but subsequent to the injuries, the plaintiff executed a general release freeing the railroad from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident in exchange for two hundred and fifty dollars. Callen, 332 U…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · November 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Adkins v. GAF Corp. (1988)
…sold by ACL is processed raw asbestos fiber. Asbestos exposure causes asbestosis. This fact was general knowledge in the asbestos industry in the State of Ohio at least after 1945. Not every exposure to asbestos, however…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Shaffer v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)
…and loss of consortium. The complaint also set forth federal claims under the Jones Act and unseaworthiness under general maritime law against only some of the parties. The complaint was amended three times to add and…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Case v. Clark Indus. Insulation (2018)
…objection instead, and (2) the defense was not available at the time of the response. {¶ 27} JCI inserted general objections to every interrogatory regarding "sales that relate to a period of time, geographical area, or activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion
Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)
…§§ 688, et seq., the General Admiralty and Maritime law, and traditional product liability law. ECF No. 1. Lindstrom claims that he contracted this disease as a result of his work-life exposures to asbestos and asbestos…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…been tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance. Id. at 593-594, 113…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2020)
…not, the Court finds that an interlocutory appeal cannot be said to materially affect the outcome of the instant case. See e.g., In re General Motors LLC, 2019 WL 8403402 at [\1] (6th Cir. Sept…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Blakely v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2019)
…Rubber & Supply Co., 117 Ohio App. 12 (7th Dist.1961). {¶31} "\[W\]hen the Ohio General Assembly enacted the current version of the \[Ohio Products Liability Act, R.C. 2307.71 et seq.\], it abrogated all…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2017)
…ANALYSIS I. Motion to Strike Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a) addresses when a deposition may be used as evidence at a hearing or trial. (1) In General. At a hearing or trial, all or…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Arpin v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2016)
…626, 68 S.Ct. 296. Prior to the action, Callen had executed a general release relieving the railroad company from liability for personal injuries sustained in the occurrence. Id. at 626-627, 68 S.Ct. 296…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Werts v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)
…tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance." Daubert at syllabus; see, also, Miller…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Beazer East, Inc. (2013)
…the enactment of OSHA. {¶ 10} William Gabriel ("Gabriel"), former assistant to the general manager of Ferro's Engineering Division, testified on cross-examination that Ferro had been the second largest manufacturer of hot tops. Until 1974…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Estate OF Blandford v. AO Smith Corp. (2016)
…asbestos until the 1970s. Indeed, Rennecker states that Hart did have a general awareness about the hazards of asbestos when it became publicized, but he was not specific as to when that was. According to evidence…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 26, 2006 · in the opinion
Blandford v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2006)
…also found that when a complaining party knows the identity of the other party's expert, the subject of his expertise and the general nature of his testimony, a party cannot complain that they are ambushed…