86 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2011)
…form of notice Placid was required to give the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants to satisfy due process requirements and ultimately discharge their claims. In general, for unknown creditors whose identities and claims are not reasonably ascertainable…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)
…effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 1, 1983 · in the opinion
Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)
…been even reasonably knowable. The supplier would thus be free of culpability, but a price of his doing business is to protect people from danger from his products — or to pay. General Motors Corp. v. Hopkins…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 22, 2015 · in the opinion
In re EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2015)
…a preponderance of the evidence or even affirmative evidence, because to require such would incorrectly shift the burden of proof. Clophus v. General Motors Corp., 769 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Tex. App.-Houston \[14th Dist.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…limiting products liability actions against nonmanufacturing sellers. Section 82.003 established a general rule that a nonmanufacturing seller is not liable for harm caused by a defective product. This limitation was enacted to protect "innocent sellers…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 29, 1988 · in the opinion
Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1988)
…accrued to him not later than 1980. Furthermore, it should be noted that when the release was signed the Pecorinos did think about any exclusions or exceptions from the general, full and final release [\570] when…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · April 25, 1980 · in the opinion
Flatt v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1980)
…is of the opinion that federal law governs the issue of collateral estoppel application in this diversity of citizenship action. The Court is persuaded that the reasoning underlying the decision in Aerojet-General Corporation v. Askew…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 21, 2006 · in the opinion
Gilcrease v. Garlock, Inc. (2006)
…We do not address whether reversible error occurred from an improper final argument. Citing the general rule that recovery of actual damages are a prerequisite to the receipt of exemplary damages,\[8\] Garlock next maintains that…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)
…439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Ross v. Union Carbide Corporation (2009)
…the parties also stated their intentions in broad but general terms: It is the intent and purpose of this agreement that at no time will the Releasees be called upon to pay any further sum or…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 8, 2007 · in the opinion
Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores (2007)
…REV. RESPIRATORY DISEASE 363, 363-68 (1996)). One text notes that: There is general agreement from epidemiologic studies that the development of asbestosis requires heavy exposure to asbestos. . . in the range of 25 to 100 fibers…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 25, 2022 · in the opinion
EL Paso Energy Est Company v. Chevron USA Inc. (2022)
…intermediaries, controls or is controlled by or is under common control with the Person specified." (Dkt. 24-3 at p. 10). "Person" means "any natural person, corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, group, union, association, trust, court…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 14, 1998 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sitz (1998)
…differently. \ \ \ \ \ \ We have concluded that the preferable approach for dealing with these problems in the federal courts is not to preclude the use of offensive collateral estoppel....The general rule should be that in cases where..…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)
…awards by holding that procedural safeguards provide all the protection that is necessary. See, e.g., Scheufler v. General Host Corp., 126 F.3d 1261, 1272 (10 th Cir.1997); Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · March 14, 2008 · in the opinion
Kozak v. Guard-Line, Inc. (2008)
…time of removal\[.\]" Id. at 264 (emphasis added). This court has adhered to the general rule that "some subsequent developments in a case do not affect a court's prior-existing jurisdiction." Garcia v. Boyar & Miller…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · September 25, 2006 · in the opinion
Jacobs v. Tapscott (2006)
…defendants posit that, despite Hendrix's deposition testimony that he was not expressing an opinion on the general value of mesothelioma cases or on the Jacobs Litigation, in his supplemental letter he opines that no one…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Burford v. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. (2024)
…In the second approach, "\[t\]he finder of fact is asked to infer that because the risk is demonstrably greater in the general population due to exposure to the substance, the claimant's injury was more…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 31, 1992 · in the opinion
Keene Corp. v. Gardner (1992)
…cases alleging design defect, the fact finder must consider the product's utility and the risk involved in its use. Turner v. General Motors Corp., 584 S.W.2d 844, 847 see Boatland of Houston, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · May 30, 1980 · in the opinion
Migues v. Nicolet Industries, Inc. (1980)
…in recognition of certain policy concerns, pro rata apportionment between joint tortfeasors. The Court has noted with some emphasis the later decision of the Texas Supreme Court in General Motors Corporation v. Simmons, 558 S.W…