82 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · December 4, 2003 · in the opinion
Adams v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (2003)
…clear that the trial court has acted under some misapprehension of the law or the evidence. Syl. pt. 1, Matheny v. Fairmont General Hospital, 212 W.Va. 740, 575 S.E.2d 350 (2002); Lamphere v…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Arpin v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2016)
…626, 68 S.Ct. 296. Prior to the action, Callen had executed a general release relieving the railroad company from liability for personal injuries sustained in the occurrence. Id. at 626-627, 68 S.Ct. 296…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)
…his clothing, tools, vehicles, and general surroundings. As a proximate result of her exposure to asbestos, Lynn suffered severe and permanent injuries including throat cancer and progressive lung disease, from which she died. DEMURRER AND RULING…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion
Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)
…a diesel locomotive, inside the cab or just in the general area." He acknowledged that "diesel fumes would go \[\] into the air in the general direction back toward the caboose, the cab of the engine and…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 2, 2013 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Carter (2013)
…the non manufacturer supplier to warn plaintiffs is different under some circumstances than the duty of a manufacturer. In general, the supplier-installer is not held to a standard as strict as imposed on the manufacturer.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)
…612. The Supreme Court struck down the state law, reasoning that: \[T\]he power delegated to the \[Interstate Commerce\] Commission by the Boiler Inspection Act as amended is a general one. It extends to the design…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 13, 1989 · in the opinion
Kath v. Burlington Northern R. Co. (1989)
…rejected this requested interrogatory, Burlington claims reversible error. The general rule is that parties are entitled to have all issues of fact submitted to the jury except those which are waived. Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · January 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Little v. the Budd Company (2018)
…and 30. Plaintiff seeks general and special damages "including but not limited to, damages for survival and wrongful death claims that Plaintiff sustained both in her individual capacity and as heir to \[her father's\] estate…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana · May 14, 2010 · in the opinion
Aurand v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2010)
…See Forry, 837 F.2d at 263 (emphasizing that FELA release interpretation must take the parties' intent into account and that "general language of release will not encompass claims of which the releasor was unaware"). Norfolk…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 2008 · in the opinion
Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2008)
…trial, district court entered a judgment on the jury verdict for the vessel owner, but granted the widow's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and awarded general and special damages. The vessel owner appealed…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 19, 2009 · in the opinion
Riedel v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2009)
…make it into the final draft. The court stated that "while the General Assembly may well have intended all asbestos-related cancer claims to be subject to the new legislation, that intent is not clearly expressed…
-
Court case · Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · September 24, 1999 · in the opinion
Wilkerson v. Burlington Northern RR Company (1999)
…not sufficient to warrant making a diagnosis of pulmonary asbestosis." Dr. Shelton's medical records reflect that Wilkerson had obtained an annual general physical examination from him over the past 10 years, and they indicated Dr…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railroad Co. (2012)
…as a result of occupational exposure to asbestos products manufactured by the defendants. The action ended in a general verdict for the defendants. The wrongful death action brought by Evans's heirs also alleged that Evans…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 4, 2013 · in the opinion
Perry v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2013)
…U.S. at 611, 47 S.Ct. 207. Congress had bestowed upon the Interstate Commerce Commission the "general" power (which now rests with the Secretary of Transportation, see Kurns, 132 S.Ct. at 1266 n. 3…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 16, 2007 · in the opinion
Aguirre v. Long IS. Rail RD. Co. (2007)
…motion, the LIRR primarily argues that the plaintiffs failed at trial to proffer legally sufficient evidence to support their claims of general and specific causation with respect to their alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified dusts…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska · October 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Butler v. Union Pacific R. Co. (2020)
…cancer which does not presently exist but which may develop in the future. This release includes any future damages, general or specific, that BUTLER may incur in an attempt to alleviate or cure any illness, disease…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC (2022)
…focus is on the facts that the plaintiff knew, not on whether the plaintiff subjectively knew she had a cause of action based on those facts. (General Motors Corp. v. Superior Court (1996) 48 Cal.App…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 27, 2014 · in the opinion
Leonard v. Board OF Supervisors OF Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College (2014)
…Indeed, the general rule in Louisiana has long been that, It is the duty of the owners of cars to examine them carefully with the view of seeing that they are safe in all their parts…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 9, 2010 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton Inc. (2010)
…of LIA preemption. In Napier, the Court held that "the power delegated to the \[Interstate Commerce\] Commission\[\[4\]\] by the Boiler Inspection Act as amended is a general one. It extends to the design, the construction…