No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

74 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 4

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    McGUFFIE v. Mead Corporation (2014)

    …. ." Generally, "the affairs of CAPCO will be under the general management of the board of directors of six individuals, of whom three will always be designated by Asarco\[, despite its minority stock position\]."\[24\] The CAPCO…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · April 25, 1980 · in the opinion

    Flatt v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1980)

    …is of the opinion that federal law governs the issue of collateral estoppel application in this diversity of citizenship action. The Court is persuaded that the reasoning underlying the decision in Aerojet-General Corporation v. Askew…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Calamia v. Parish of Jefferson (2020)

    …arts. 927(A) and 928(B). The general rule is that "prescription statutes are strictly construed against prescription and in favor of the claim sought to be extinguished by it." Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …its employees in the construction and service departments working with asbestos, it is not reasonable to infer from the company's general safety consciousness alone, that it is highly probable that the company was aware of…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …in sanding the tiles. Also, there was no evidence of a general nature. There was no evidence as to what type of tiles would have been used in Iran 35 years ago. There was no evidence…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …litigant to rely on abstract generalities, but must instruct in specific terms that relate the party's [\1088] theory to the particular case." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 572 \[34 Cal…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …specialist in occupational medicine called by Quarles, testified not about any specific facts of this case, but about the evolving general state of knowledge in medicine, science and industry, and about the dangers of asbestos in…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Company (2024)

    …in their depositions, both taken on March 26, 2019, that their father had served as the "general manager" of Lenox until his death in 1974, at which point they, along with a third brother, Paul Lang…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · September 16, 2012 · in the opinion

    Church v. Dana Kepner Company, Inc. (2012)

    …even if Plaintiff's allegations were true, the information conveyed by Johns Manville "would only have provided Dana Kepner with knowledge of the dangerous characteristics of asbestos in a general sense" (id. at 10 (emphasis added)…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)

    …Corp. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 1222, 1231 (Casey).) In Casey, the plaintiff accused the defendant, a general contractor, of exposing him to asbestos at jobsites where the plaintiff worked for a subcontractor. (Id. at p…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 9, 2020 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Keenan Properties, Inc. (2020)

    …Dr. Horn based his testimony on the Rawlings summary. Instead, Dr. Horn relied on his general experience as a physician and hospital director, which provided a reasonable basis for his opinion regarding future medical costs. (§ 801…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 1982 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …However, an occupational disease is not an "injury" that is susceptible of such precise determination since occupational diseases in general are progressive diseases that develop over a long period of time. The symptoms of an occupational…