84 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion
McKenzie v. AW Chesterson Co. (2016)
…The Washington Supreme Court held that "the general rule" for common-law products liability cases that a product manufacturer has no duty "to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products," articulated…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 8, 1993 · in the opinion
Keene Corp. v. Rogers (1993)
…Keene does not dispute that Alabama law should control the case in general but it contends that since the appellees did not prove and the trial court did not judicially notice any Alabama law on this…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Ssw, Inc. (2012)
…to specific enumerated "chapters and sections ... to the exclusion of the law of the jurisdiction in which they are [\600] incorporated." These specific enumerated provisions include neither chapter 2 in general nor section 2010 in particular. (…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion
Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)
…sufficient contact with the state for the court to assume either general or limited jurisdiction over it. Plaintiffs opposed the motion, asserting among other things that ACL had consented to jurisdiction by making a general appearance…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994 · in the opinion
Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
…that the defendants' products were located at shipyards where the Parks was overhauled, and were used by shipyard workers on ships in general, does not support a reasonable inference that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
…is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 12, 1985 · in the opinion
Lee v. Celotex Corp. (1985)
…through 1976 contained asbestos. However, in paragraph 2 of the general objections to those interrogatories, National Gypsum states that it answers those interrogatories "with reference to products that may have been used to insulate pipes, boilers…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Beazer East, Inc. (2013)
…the enactment of OSHA. {¶ 10} William Gabriel ("Gabriel"), former assistant to the general manager of Ferro's Engineering Division, testified on cross-examination that Ferro had been the second largest manufacturer of hot tops. Until 1974…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 7, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)
…defendant's broadly-worded motion is GRANTED only as to any general references to the time or money spent defending this lawsuit and as to any references to defendant's wealth during the liability phase of…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)
…R's warning and "taken steps to have the clothes washed at a commercial laundry services." This argument fails both as a general matter and under the facts specific to this case. First, the general matter…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Evans v. Flowserve US Inc. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · November 19, 2012 · in the opinion
Stevens v. CBS Corporation (2012)
…that the "type of incident involved" have "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce," and that "the general character of the activity giving rise to the incident shows a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity." Id…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994 · in the opinion
Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
…state that he saw OCF's name on Kaylo boxes at the shipyard. But the questioning reverted back to general product trade names, and Durham was asked the time period that Kaylo products were customarily used…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Tallman v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…by Mr. Tallman. (D.I. 97 at 5-7) Plaintiff's references to general block exposure do not assist the court in determining to which specific components Mr. Tallman was exposed. (See D.I. 91 at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…concerning the character or quality of the chattel in question," and "does not apply to statements of opinion," "loose general praise," "sales talk," or "puffing." These requirements and limitations suggest that the misrepresentation must be affirmative…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion
Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)
…mid 1980's, concern over the insurance industry and tort litigation prompted many reports on both a national and state level. See United States Attorney General's Tort Policy Working Group, Report on the Causes, Extent…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Appleton v. Allied Signal (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 1994 · in the opinion
Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co. (1994)
…The proceedings here had not reached that stage when Wash Williamson died. (4) "The general rule is that \courts have inherent power to enter judgments nunc pro tunc so as to relate back to the time…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Carson v. 3M Company (2018)
…s 1972 Federal Register publication regarding asbestos safety precautions, coupled with the 1979 Reenactment of the General Laws of Rhode Island (1956)—precludes the exclusive application of the WCA to the Decedent. The 1972 OSHA publication…