85 results for “General Electric”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Carlson v. 84 Lumber Company (2011)
…fourth specific torts factor is not useful to this Court's choice of law analysis. 2 Application of General Interest-Weighing Factors The choice of law analysis may not always turn on the quantity of contacts…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)
…4th 413, 424 (Wysinger).) However, "\[w\]ith a special verdict, unlike a general verdict or a general verdict with special findings, a reviewing court will not infer findings to support the verdict." (Singh, at p. 358…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 19, 2012 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc. (2012)
…fiber that began or caused the process that resulted in mesothelioma, but that asbestos fiber in general is the only known cause of the disease. Dr. Maddox also testified that mesothelioma results from an individual's…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Southern Wall Products v. Bolin (2018)
…fairness divorced from traditional practice cannot transform a judgment rendered in the absence of authority into law. As a general rule, the sovereign's exercise of power requires some act by which the defendant "purposefully avails…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion
Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…affidavit of Joan M. Taffi, a Goodrich Corporation employee, does not contain any specificity beyond the general claim that "\[p\]rior to 1964, B.F. Goodrich Company produced and sold asbestos floor tile, as well as…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · October 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Poce v. O & G Industries, Inc. (2021)
…whereby the plaintiff sought a determination as to which of its general liability insurance carriers were obligated to defend and indemnify the claims against it in light of multiple lawsuits alleging injuries from exposure to asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992 · in the opinion
Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)
…112 S.Ct. 1671, 118 L.Ed.2d 391 (New Rule 238 withstands constitutional challenges on due process and equal protection grounds.); Leonard v. General Motors Corp., Civil No. 88-2380, slip op. at 5 (E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Nauheimer v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)
…alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)
…was proximately caused by his exposure to asbestos-containing products provided by the Defendants. The Indiana General Assembly has enacted two statutes that limit the period of time within which individuals can file product liability claims…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · April 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP (2015)
…which the alleged legal malpractice occurred — is terminated; consequently, "subsequent general representation of the plaintiffs regarding matters unrelated to the initial transaction does not warrant the application of the doctrine." De May v. Moore & Bruce, LLP…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Kramer v. Amcord Inc. (2020)
…testified that gem and diamond cutter was an alternative title under the general "stonecutter" category and, further, that a vocational rehabilitation expert had confirmed that the general "stonecutter" category was in fact the correct one for…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)
…appellant presented Richard Lemen, Ph.D., an epidemiologist, former assistant surgeon general of the United States, and former deputy [\666] director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Dr. Lemen described epidemiology as…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003 · in the opinion
Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)
…225] The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio acts as an exception to the general rules of prescription by suspending the running of prescription when the circumstances of the case fall into one…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)
…litigant to rely on abstract generalities, but must instruct in specific terms that relate the party's [\1088] theory to the particular case." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 572 \[34 Cal…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)
…marks omitted.) Id. In contrast, a defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiratorial scheme and agrees to do its part to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator. Id. ¶ 13 Because a conspiracy…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion
Carlstrand v. Domco Prods. of Texas (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…judgment on plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages. Defendant contends that plaintiffs failed to proffer any expert opinion or other evidence establishing general and specific causation that any of its Azrock vinyl asbestos floor products caused Mr…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 18, 2018 · in the opinion
Vanhoy v. American International Industries (2018)
…to understate the hazards of asbestos exposure, all for their own profit and gain, Defendant \[Metropolitan Life Insurance Company\] willfully, wantonly, and with malice in calculated disregard for the welfare of the general public. . . . (Am. Compl…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 5, 2006 · in the opinion
Dankenbrink v. Foster Wheeler (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2006)
…products during overlapping periods of time from the 1940's to the 1990's so that the state of the art testimony and other expert testimony in a general way will be substantially common to all…