No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

202 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 4 of 11

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …In some cases, there are no special rules for liability toward contractor's employees, and general negligence rules are applied. (Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (La.Ct.App. 2004) 878 So.2d 631, 639, fn…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 23, 2010 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …there is no causation. (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin).) "Plaintiffs may prove causation in an asbestos case by demonstrating that the plaintiff's or decedent's exposure…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)

    …negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …employer had no liability for plaintiff's injuries beyond payment of workers' compensation benefits\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1198 \[applied Proposition 51 to strict liability asbestos case\].) Defendant…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …care. In such a case, liability turns on what a reasonably prudent distributor would have known and warned about. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003 (Anderson); Valentine v. Baxter…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    McCann v. Foster Wheeler (2008)

    …law, McCann's claim did not accrue until he was diagnosed with mesothelioma and is not barred by the lapse of time. (See Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 531, fn…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …548, 568, fn. 5 \[34 Cal.Rptr.2d 607, 882 P.2d 298\]; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson); Daly v…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion

    The Marley-Wylain Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2016)

    …and distributors to strict products liability. (O'Neil v. Crane Co. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 335, 347; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Michigan does not. (Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. …

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 292, 332.) III. Section 3294 Punitive damages serve the dual public purposes of punishment and deterrence. (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658; see § 3294…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 4, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (1999)

    …its motion for new trial. At the August 22 hearing, the court and counsel discussed Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp: (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71 (Buttram)…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rickert v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2019)

    …1452, and Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 to the extent they impose the "seriously inconvenient" burden on parties moving for a mere stay based on forum non conveniens\].) Moreover…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    …in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Gatton v. AP Green Services, Inc. (1998)

    …in his own personal injury action —one which, according to the pleadings, produced a jury verdict in his favor and against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and American Honda Motor Company, Inc., just weeks before he died…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)

    …inter alia, upon a theory of design defect. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Defective design may be established under two theories: (1) the consumer expectations test, which asks "whether…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …from asbestos\] was neither known nor knowable by the application of scientific knowledge available at the time of manufacture and/or distribution" of the product. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal. 3d 987…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …to adequately warn of those potential risks, and that the lack of sufficient warning was a substantial factor in causing Cornelius's harm. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002, 993…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Dock (2017)

    …the more lenient approach, it is sufficient if the plaintiff proves the defendant's product was at his or her work site." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)

    …Formosa liken this case to Hunter, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th 1282 and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 (Dumin). There is no fair comparison. The plaintiff in Hunter testified…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)

    …presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…