74 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 4 of 4
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Fullen v. 3M Company (2019)
…s Motion to Dismiss Claim for Punitive Damages, Plaintiffs stated that Lockheed had asserted the improper standard for punitive damages in a case such as this one, and then they cited to Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005 · in the opinion
National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)
…4th 645, 689 (Cal. 1995) (holding that the continuous injury trigger of coverage should be applied to third party claims of continuous or progressively deteriorating bodily injury or property damage); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)
…Heel v. Sherman Equip., 442 N.E.2d 199, 202 (Ill.1982); see David G. Owen and Mary J. Davis, 2 Owens & Davis on Products Liability, § 16:15, at 636 (4th ed. 2014).\[15\] But, in…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)
…the Court of Appeals referenced this Court's decision in Adams v. Owens-Illinois, stating that our decision applied "the same policy of avoiding expansive new duties to hold that an employer owed no duty to…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991 · in the opinion
Mitchell, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty (1991)
…Ed.2d 650 (1981); Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec v. Am. Home Assur., 613 F. Supp. 1549 (D.N.J. 1985); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 597 F. Supp. 1515 (D.D.C…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 24, 2015 · in the opinion
Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)
…Paul Sroka, as plaintiffs. ECF No. 90-3. \[2\] The Plaintiffs also sued Union Carbide Corporation; John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.; Owens-Illinois Glass Company; E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc.; Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Universal Refractories Company; J…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion
Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)
…Fischer, Insurance Coverage for Mass Exposure Tort Claims: The Debate Over the Appropriate Trigger Rule, 45 Drake L. Rev. 625, 652 (1997)); see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 650 A.2d 974, 979 (N…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…Id. Rather than find that the duty to warn extended by way of an intermediary, the Court instead required a relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. Cf. Adams v. Owens-Illinois, 119 Md. App. 395, 411…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…in the business of selling such a product, and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. In Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 27, 2014 · in the opinion
Citrano v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)
…between \[plaintiff\], GE, and the U.S. Navy Vessels allegedly a part of the asbestos exposure"); Covington v. Owens Illinois Glass Co., CIV.A. GLR-12-461, 2012 WL 4764883, at [\1]-[\2] (D.Md. Oct…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…both by Wood and by the out-of-state cases that have followed in its wake, the Mays make a series of miscellaneous arguments. We reject each of them. First, citing Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 4, 2004
Wajer v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (2004)
…asbestos insulation and products nearby. The circuit court granted summary judgment to BGE, reasoning that a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that several…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 31, 2019 · in the opinion
Pinner v. Pinner (2019)
…showing of privity or its equivalent"). Under that rule, "an attorney owes a duty to his client or employer, and therefore only that client or employer can recover against him for that breach." Id. at 127…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)
…permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…