No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

177 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 4 of 9

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)

    …federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 10, 2016 · in the opinion

    French v. AW Chesterton Company (2016)

    …conduct performed under color of federal office; and (4) defendant raises a colorable federal defense to plaintiff's claim. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3rd Cir. 1998) (citing Mesa v…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)

    …a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …later diagnosis of a distinct malignant asbestos-related condition. The diagnosis of a malignant asbestos-related condition creates a new cause of action." Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630 (Wis…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Dock (2017)

    …the more lenient approach, it is sufficient if the plaintiff proves the defendant's product was at his or her work site." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …than one proximate cause of an injury" such that multiple "causes frequently operate concurrently so that \[they\] constitute a direct proximate cause of the resulting harm." (Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 225 Mich.App…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 7, 2012 · in the opinion

    Lewis v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2012)

    …a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …determination. It is noted, that in New York, injury occurs when plaintiff is exposed to asbestos. (see Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 NY2d 449 (1997); Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litig. \[Chrabas\], 273…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Hall v. Warren Pumps LLC (2010)

    …(See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987 \[manufacturers of asbestos products have a duty to warn of known risks posed by their products to ensure safe usage\].) Under a negligence theory…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. Thorpe Insulation Company (2009)

    …v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1409, 1420 (Lineaweaver).) Relying on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 (Dumin) and Lineaweaver, supra, 31 Cal.App.4th 1409, Thorpe…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 27, 2002 · in the opinion

    Madden v. Able Supply Co. (2002)

    …344, 346 (S.D.Miss.1994); Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653 (E.D.Tex.1999) (holding by implication that corporate defendants are § 1442(a)(1) defendants). In reaching their conclusion…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ronsini v. Worthington Corp. (Matter Of New York City Asbestos Litigation. Elaine Ronsini V. Garlock, Inc., 1998)

    …settling defendants (see, Bigelow v Acands, Inc., 196 AD2d 436; Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 AD2d 830, 831), and we decline to disturb the jury's determination as to this, and as to the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …absent evidence (which has not been presented) that Morgan was exposed to airborne asbestos fibers released by that GE motor during his visit. See Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 457 (Ala…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. Ronald Dummitt v. AW Chesterton (2012)

    …In re New York Asbestos Litigation (Marshall), supra at 256 (citing Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation (Ronsini), supra; Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp, 221 AD2d 830 \[3rd Dept 1995\]; Bigelow v. Acands, Inc…