96 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Davenport v. Mcic, Inc. (2017)
…is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…absent evidence (which has not been presented) that Morgan was exposed to airborne asbestos fibers released by that GE motor during his visit. See Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 457 (Ala…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion
Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)
…nevertheless, that there existed factual disputes regarding when plaintiff first had a duty to investigate whether his exposure to diesel exhaust may have been a cause of his cancers. See also Owens v. Union Pacific RR…
-
Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)
…698 S.E.2d 835, 838 (Ct. App. 2010) ("Unfair prejudice means an undue tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis." (quoting State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 666, 552 S.E.2d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · February 14, 2007 · in the opinion
Fleischman v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007)
…of limitations, asbestosis and mesothelioma were separate claims even though each was attributed to the same asbestos exposure. Id. at 120-21. In Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., recent…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024 · in the opinion
Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion
Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…Va. 1948)). The Supreme Court of Virginia has recognized that in cases of asbestos exposure, "\[a\] plaintiff may prove exposure to a particular manufacturer's product through circumstantial evidence." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 413…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001 · in the opinion
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…whom an injured plaintiff otherwise could have sought recovery, his or her tort remedy is far from complete. This fact is highlighted by our supreme court's recent decision in Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…from asbestos\] was neither known nor knowable by the application of scientific knowledge available at the time of manufacture and/or distribution" of the product. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal. 3d 987…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 24, 2010 · in the opinion
Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co. (2010)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…proof, plaintiff cannot overcome Westinghouse's summary judgment motion based on alleged exposure to asbestos in electrical gear at Alabama River Pulp. See generally Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 457 (Ala.
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
…said he was exposed to asbestos insulation on pipes, furnaces, ovens and machinery while tearing out and installing equipment, and it claimed the owners were liable as premises owners. The owners argued that Kentucky's workers'…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017
Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)
…testimony about shared work on the valves, and the maker owes a duty to warn and to design safely where its valves required or specified asbestos gaskets and packing. Missouri's statutory cap on punitive damages…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…