97 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 4 of 5
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…case law involving strict liability and asbestos actions. See id. at 23-26 (relying on, inter alia, Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947, 949 (Pa. 1985) (the trial court must…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 21, 2015 · in the opinion
Scainetti v. BW/IP (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…plaintiff mixed, worked with, and was exposed to asbestos fibers used in defendant's product\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · November 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Van Fossen v. MidAmerican Energy Co. (2009)
…section 427, one who employs an independent contractor to do work which the employer knows or has reason to know involves an "abnormally dangerous activity" owes a nondelegable duty to those exposed to the hazard. Restatement…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion
McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)
…must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · January 7, 2022 · in the opinion
Data v. Joy Global Underground Mining (2022)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Rost v. Ford Motor Co. (2016)
…Ltd., 153 Or.App. 415, 959 P.2d 89, 94 (1998); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 456 (Ala. 1992), the majority of state and federal courts have adopted the "frequency, regularity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion
Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…Va. 1948)). The Supreme Court of Virginia has recognized that in cases of asbestos exposure, "\[a\] plaintiff may prove exposure to a particular manufacturer's product through circumstantial evidence." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 413…
-
Court case · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · December 4, 2018 · in the opinion
Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (2018)
…c. 260, § 2D, the so-called asbestos revival statute, see Commonwealth v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 38 Mass. App. Ct. 600, 603 (1995), the Legislature established special time periods during which the [\537] Commonwealth and its…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 7, 2012 · in the opinion
Lewis v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2012)
…See 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a). If any plaintiff and any defendant share state citizenship, complete diversity would be defeated. Owen Equipment and Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365 (1978); Grand Union Superm…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006
Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)
…his employer knew of asbestos dangers. The Wellman rule, under which a premises owner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees doing inherently dangerous work, applies only if the contractor or its employee knew…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 4, 2004
Wajer v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (2004)
…asbestos insulation and products nearby. The circuit court granted summary judgment to BGE, reasoning that a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that several…
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · June 28, 2005
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2005)
…absent negligent selection, and a landowner ordinarily owes no liability to a contractor's employees for a condition the contractor was hired to address when the landowner has no superior knowledge. A general verdict stands if…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 15, 2022
Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2022)
…as employer of an independent contractor. Under Pennsylvania law, a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employee for a danger the contractor knows of, and the retained-control and peculiar-risk exceptions did…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 17, 2005 · in the opinion
Rudy v. A-Best Products Company (2005)
…The question of whether a landowner owes a duty to warn an independent contractor of dangerous conditions on the premises turns on whether the owner possesses "superior knowledge" or information which places him in a better…
-
Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · January 16, 2008
Fossen v. Midamerican Energy Company (2008)
…of harm and public policy; on that analysis a landowner owes no duty to the spouse of an independent contractor's employee who carried asbestos fibers home from the premises. Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 2021
Smith v. AC Light. & Elec. Supplies, LLC (2021)
…200 and common-law negligence, a premises owner or contractor owes a duty to provide a safe workplace only if it had authority to supervise or control the activity causing the injury; evidence that it oversaw…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012
Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)
…the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · June 30, 2021
Georgia Power Company v. Campbell (2021)
…on the statute of repose, and remanded for further proceedings. An owner owes no duty to a contractor's employees only if it relinquished possession and did not control the work, and contract terms showing retained…