No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 43 of 49

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)

    …or third party claim" and "Property owner" as "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes"). We note that our sister court has recently issued a plurality opinion questioning…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Stellar v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2015)

    …585 Pa. 335, 888 A.2d 740, 746 (2005). Whether a defendant owes a duty of care to a plaintiff is a question of law in Pennsylvania. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg Coll., 989 F.2d 1360, 1366…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)

    …position. See Keller v. City of Spokane, 44 P.3d 845, 848 (Wash. 2002) (en banc) ("a court must decide not only who owes the duty, but also to whom the duty is owed. . . ."). Here, the…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 30, 2022 · in the opinion

    Milone v. Aii Acquisition Corp., LLC (2022)

    …man who worked at the subject bakery did not have personal knowledge regarding the alleged asbestos when his testimony only indicated that he was "\told' that the insulating boards above the ovens \probably was asbestos.'" Id…

  5. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kivell v. Air Prods. and Chemicals (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…

  6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …industry custom or feasibility of design can be considered when the plaintiff opens the door by "present\[ing\] evidence that puts in issue the custom of the industry or feasibility of alternative design" as "the defendant…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Unterberg v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp. (2016)

    …is not enough that related corporations have the same officers and directors, or that the a parent corporation owns all of its subsidiary's stock, or even that a parent and subsidiary hold themselves out as…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · July 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2023)

    …LLC, Salem, MA, for Plaintiff Ruth A. Pritt. Brian J. Schneider, Schneider Law Group PLLC, Richmond, VA, Christopher Owen Massenburg, Manning Gross and Massenburg LLP, New Orleans, LA, Jonathan F. Tabasky, Megan K. Sullivan, Stephanie M…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    Stearns v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (2018)

    …to, and created by, its independent contractors. Under Massachusetts law, a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to the employees of its independent contractors. Diodato v. United States, 972 F.2d 337 (1st Cir. 1992…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · April 1, 2020 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Seidenbach (2020)

    …CA, for Amicus Curiae. Before OWEN, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, STEWART, DENNIS, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. [\343] JAMES C. HO, Circuit Judge, joined by OWEN, Chief…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Masters v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (2021)

    …amount in controversy must exceed $75,000, and there must be complete diversity of citizenship between plaintiffs and defendants. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)

    …construction materials. Surface Combustion, Inc. provided glass ovens, termed lehrs at Anchor Hocking Glass Company. \[2\] Two other defendants listed on the verdict sheet settled, and are not involved in these appeals. \[3\] Mesothelioma, a cancer…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 14, 2010 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (2010)

    …manufactured. ¶ 17 Macias argues that the purpose of a manufacturer's product is relevant to the question of whether the manufacturer owes a duty to warn of the dangers of another manufacturer's hazardous product. In…

  14. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    McKENNEY'S Inc. v. Sinyard (2019)

    …Brooks v. Sessoms, 47 Ga. App. 554-555 (1), 171 S.E. 222 (1933). See also Mayo v. Owen, 208 Ga. 483, 486 (1), 67 S.E.2d 709 (1951); OCGA § 24-6-602. Therefore, in…

  15. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    In re Aldrich Pump LLC (2023)

    …Trust. Meanwhile, each Debtor owns an operating subsidiary and has a business of sorts—managing the tens of thousands of asbestos litigation claims against them. See Declaration of Allen Tananbaum in support of Debtor's Objection.…

  16. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · June 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Bechtel Corporation v. Batchelor (2018)

    …possession and control of all or part of the plant such that it owed Mr. Batchelor the same duty that a landowner owes an invitee under the law of premises liability. For the reasons explained below…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 31, 2019 · in the opinion

    Pinner v. Pinner (2019)

    …showing of privity or its equivalent"). Under that rule, "an attorney owes a duty to his client or employer, and therefore only that client or employer can recover against him for that breach." Id. at 127…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …user is later injured. See Davis, 975 F.2d at 173 (noting that "no Louisiana case has clearly addressed the issue" of whether a "product manufacturer owes \[a\] duty to the employee\[s\] of a purchaser. . …

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Latiolais v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2020)

    …Snyder, for Defendant-Appellant. Charles S. Dameron, for Defendant-Appellant. William Harty, for Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Before: OWEN, Chief Judge, and JONES, SMITH, STEWART…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Holley Performance Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …