980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 45 of 49
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Edward Orton, JR. Ceramic Foundation (2023)
…The Supreme Court of Illinois "has long recognized that \every person owes a duty of ordinary care to all others to guard against injuries which naturally flow as a reasonably probable and foreseeable consequence of an…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 24, 1999 · in the opinion
Perez v. Todd Shipyards Corp. (1999)
…e.). \[3\] A claim that is derivative is one "which has not its origin in itself, but owes its existence to something foregoing." BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 443 (6th Ed.1990); see also Fidelity & Deposit Co…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)
…permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Matter of Crozier v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Harrow Industries LLC v. Nexus Corporation (2018)
…In Count II, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant owes Plaintiff a contractual duty to defend and indemnify Plaintiff against any claims arising after the closing date of the Agreement. Defendant has purportedly breached its contractual obligations by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute"). This Court likewise is persuaded that…
-
Court case · Montana Supreme Court · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion
Orr v. State (2004)
…maintains, without citation to authority, that sovereign immunity is not merely a bar to suit but is actually a legal doctrine to the effect that the government owes no duty to its citizens. This is incorrect…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)
…metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)
…who worked on the roof and other parts of the Open Hearth." (Serna R. 30). As a mason, he repaired and maintained furnaces and ovens used to make steel. On March 18, 1998, Dr. Mark K…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 10, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…2d 1164, 1168 (La. 1991). Further, the same principal of limited shareholder liability "applies where one corporation wholly owns another." Bujol, 922 So. 2d at 1127. Courts may disregard the concept of corporate separateness, or "pierce…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Luca v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…corporate restructuring resulting in a new entity, Aldrich Pump LLC ("Aldrich"), which now owns the former Ingersoll Rand's alleged asbestosrelated liabilities at issue in this litigation. (Id.) In addition, the notice indicates that on June…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · June 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Nix (2014)
…industry, and warnings and safety. Ziegler is a petroleum engineer who owns a safety and petroleum consulting firm and a small oil company. He had worked in the drilling industry since he was fifteen years old…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion
Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)
…liability for injuries it caused to plaintiff). Accordingly, plaintiff has alleged that Hopeman Brothers owes a duty of care to plaintiff, the breach of which has caused the damage for which recovery is sought. See Ford…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 8, 2024 · in the opinion
The Continental Insurance Company v. Pennsylvania Electric Company (2024)
…owes a duty to defend Penelec for the underlying action. See Penelec's Answer, New Matter, and Counterclaim at 23 ¶ 41 (unpaginated). In Count II, Penelec asserted a claim for a declaratory judgment that Continental owes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Metal Masters, Inc. (2022)
…ECF No. 1.) Amerisure filed the instant declaratory judgment action against Metal Masters and Weist on November 10, 2021, seeking a declaration that it owes no coverage obligation for the Weist Verdict. (Compl. ECF No. 1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion
Andres v. Raytheon Technologies Corp. (2022)
…Mr. Andres to asbestos.\[1\] (ECF No. 379 at 13-14.) However, the documents to which the Plaintiff cite do not show that Huntsman owns this property. Rather, these documents show that Huntsman's subsidiaries, and…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)
…Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …