980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 46 of 49
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 14, 2019 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. AO Smith Water Prods., Co. (2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…original diversity jurisdiction when complete diversity of citizenship exists between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2003 · in the opinion
Dekens v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (2003)
…cognizance of Food and Drug Administration regulations concerning proper levels of lead in paint for toys. Similar dependence is placed on the Bureau of Radiological Health for permissible radiation levels from products such as microwave ovens, \[…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Wittman v. Coty, Inc. (2018)
…that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owen-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion
Germain v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheller, LLC (2010)
…status and location of the property is also a significant factor. If the property is owned by the same entity that owns the real property, this suggests that the property may be an improvement to real…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…USF&G, Defendants contend, "has thus far refused to pay anything towards the accrued interest" and therefore "owes at least $171,172.60" in interest on the $4.5 million covenant judgment. (Id.) However, the record…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)
…to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion
McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp. (2010)
…even one that owns all the stock of a subsidiary corporation\[,\] is not subject to liability for the acts of its subsidiary unless the parent so controls the operation of the subsidiary as to make it…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2018 · in the opinion
Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Polar-Mohr Maschinenvertriebsgesellschaft Gmbh, Co. KG v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2018)
…the policy period, including death at any time resulting therefrom." Id. at ZUR002026. Zurich also owes the policyholder a duty to defend, with defense costs covered in addition to the policy's limits. Id. at ZUR002027…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…a Ford engineer. They indicated that assembly lines, ovens, steel components, and extensive conveyor systems were necessary and essential to the manufacture and production of motor vehicles and that the dismantling of old assembly lines and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Sarradet v. the Dow Chemical Company (2014)
…upon a corporate officer or employee for breaching a duty arising solely because of the employment relationship.\[16\] Those criteria are as follows: The principal or employer owes a duty of care to the third person…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · January 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2021)
…45 U.S.C. § 51. Under FELA, a railroad owes its "employees a nondelegable duty to use reasonable care in furnishing them with a safe place to work." Dykes v. BNSF Ry. Co., 356 F. Supp…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 10, 2008 · in the opinion
Tabor v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)
…is clear that the allegations of plaintiff's petition refer only to acts or omissions that are excluded from coverage under the terms of the policy, then the insurer owes no duty to defend. Bourque v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Smith v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…determining whether a subsidiary corporation is a "mere instrumentality" of the parent corporation: (a) The parent corporation owns all or most of the capital stock of the subsidiary. (b) The parent and subsidiary corporations have common…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Shea v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …