981 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 46 of 50
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 10, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…2d 1164, 1168 (La. 1991). Further, the same principal of limited shareholder liability "applies where one corporation wholly owns another." Bujol, 922 So. 2d at 1127. Courts may disregard the concept of corporate separateness, or "pierce…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Luca v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…corporate restructuring resulting in a new entity, Aldrich Pump LLC ("Aldrich"), which now owns the former Ingersoll Rand's alleged asbestosrelated liabilities at issue in this litigation. (Id.) In addition, the notice indicates that on June…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · June 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Nix (2014)
…industry, and warnings and safety. Ziegler is a petroleum engineer who owns a safety and petroleum consulting firm and a small oil company. He had worked in the drilling industry since he was fifteen years old…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 15, 2022 · in the opinion
Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)
…liability for injuries it caused to plaintiff). Accordingly, plaintiff has alleged that Hopeman Brothers owes a duty of care to plaintiff, the breach of which has caused the damage for which recovery is sought. See Ford…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 8, 2024 · in the opinion
The Continental Insurance Company v. Pennsylvania Electric Company (2024)
…owes a duty to defend Penelec for the underlying action. See Penelec's Answer, New Matter, and Counterclaim at 23 ¶ 41 (unpaginated). In Count II, Penelec asserted a claim for a declaratory judgment that Continental owes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion
Andres v. Raytheon Technologies Corp. (2022)
…Mr. Andres to asbestos.\[1\] (ECF No. 379 at 13-14.) However, the documents to which the Plaintiff cite do not show that Huntsman owns this property. Rather, these documents show that Huntsman's subsidiaries, and…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)
…Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 14, 2019 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. AO Smith Water Prods., Co. (2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…original diversity jurisdiction when complete diversity of citizenship exists between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2003 · in the opinion
Dekens v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (2003)
…cognizance of Food and Drug Administration regulations concerning proper levels of lead in paint for toys. Similar dependence is placed on the Bureau of Radiological Health for permissible radiation levels from products such as microwave ovens, \[…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion
Germain v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheller, LLC (2010)
…status and location of the property is also a significant factor. If the property is owned by the same entity that owns the real property, this suggests that the property may be an improvement to real…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…USF&G, Defendants contend, "has thus far refused to pay anything towards the accrued interest" and therefore "owes at least $171,172.60" in interest on the $4.5 million covenant judgment. (Id.) However, the record…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)
…to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion
McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp. (2010)
…even one that owns all the stock of a subsidiary corporation\[,\] is not subject to liability for the acts of its subsidiary unless the parent so controls the operation of the subsidiary as to make it…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…