980 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 48 of 49
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · April 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Taylor v. BASF Catalysts, LLC (2023)
…its subsidiaries was approximately $100 million. {¶ 11} Regarding Ester, Paro testified that Hallstar owns Ester, but that Ester is a subsidiary of Hallstar Solutions. He testified further that C.P. Hall's Stow warehouse became an…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
National Fire Insurance Company OF Hartford v. Burns & Scalo Roofing Company (2017)
…on an analysis of facts and/or evidence. As detailed below, whether an insurer owes a duty to defend an insured, in a litigation brought against the insured, is an issue generally determined by considering the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Godfrey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion
ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…using asbestos insulation. WILSON CHALCO: Deceased from Mesothelioma. Exposed from 1971-2006 from work as laborer and maintenance, and from working around others using asbestos containing products. Exposed to asbestos containing ovens, matrix boards, valves, pumps…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · August 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Golik v. CBS Corp. (2020)
…of premises owes to the servant of the independent contractor employed to perform work on his premises the duty to avoid endangering him by the owner's own negligence or affirmative act, but owes no duty…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Montell v. Viking Pump (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state." (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · June 29, 2011 · in the opinion
Tkk USA Inc. v. Safety National Casualty Corporation (2011)
…471 (7th Cir. 2002). III. DISCUSSION The parties agree that Safety National owes Thermos no duty to defend. Instead, the question before me is whether Safety National must reimburse Thermos for the cost of defending the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)
…nder maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute."), with Quirin v…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)
…2d at 248). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos insulation that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · March 30, 2022 · in the opinion
Ripple v. CBS Corporation (2022)
…marrying into a cause of action" for loss of consortium. Domino's potentially opens a wide door to a future case in which a person, not necessarily involved in a relationship of love and affection with…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 13, 2005 · in the opinion
Flanders v. California Coastal Communities (2005)
…Holdings, Inc., are pitted against each other. Each denies that it owns the liabilities of M.W. Kellogg. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff had made a prima facie case of jurisdiction against California Coastal…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · August 13, 1971 · in the opinion
Linnell, Choate & Webber v. Heyde (1971)
…she is employed at the Bath Memorial Hospital as a medical records librarian, has no dependent children, is self-supporting and owns her own home. So far as the record discloses, she is willing to pay…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…harm. "A person that owns property is negligent if he or she fails to use reasonable care to keep the property in a reasonably safe condition. A person that owns property must use reasonable care to…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)
…R.C. 2307.96(B), the statute provides no definition for the term "substantial factor." This lack of clarity opens the door to inconsistent application of R.C. 2307.96 and gave rise to this appeal. {¶…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Chapter 95. Instead, the chapter uses the phrase "property owner," which section 95.001(3) defines to mean "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes." TEX. CIV. PRAC…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Miller v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Witte v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. (2021)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. Here…