981 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 48 of 50
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006 · in the opinion
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…the control of any part of the work, is subject to liability for physical harm to others for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care, which is caused by his failure to…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Hubbard v. California Water Service Company (2018)
…explained in a footnote that it was using the term "landowner" to refer "to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe." (Kinsman…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · December 10, 1992 · in the opinion
In re Prudential Lines, Inc. (1992)
…The parties further stipulate that American Club owes Trustee $145,655.57, excluding interest, relating to other claims. Finally, Trustee contends that American Club owes an additional $216,304.62 relating to certain other claims. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 20, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…Fed. R. Evid. 702. But experts may not provide "legal conclusions or. . . simply tell the jury what result to reach." Owen v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 698 F.2d 236, 240 (5th Cir. 1983); McBroom v. Payne…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Graul v. Tecumseh Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state." (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)
…statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
National Fire Insurance Company OF Hartford v. Burns & Scalo Roofing Company (2017)
…on an analysis of facts and/or evidence. As detailed below, whether an insurer owes a duty to defend an insured, in a litigation brought against the insured, is an issue generally determined by considering the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Godfrey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion
ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…using asbestos insulation. WILSON CHALCO: Deceased from Mesothelioma. Exposed from 1971-2006 from work as laborer and maintenance, and from working around others using asbestos containing products. Exposed to asbestos containing ovens, matrix boards, valves, pumps…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · August 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Golik v. CBS Corp. (2020)
…of premises owes to the servant of the independent contractor employed to perform work on his premises the duty to avoid endangering him by the owner's own negligence or affirmative act, but owes no duty…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Montell v. Viking Pump (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state." (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)
…nder maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute."), with Quirin v…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)
…2d at 248). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos insulation that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · March 30, 2022 · in the opinion
Ripple v. CBS Corporation (2022)
…marrying into a cause of action" for loss of consortium. Domino's potentially opens a wide door to a future case in which a person, not necessarily involved in a relationship of love and affection with…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…Hennessy argues the plain words of the [\158] statute require the entry of summary judgment because it owes no duty under the statute. Plaintiff responds that the language in the statute "used by" the defendant applies…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · August 13, 1971 · in the opinion
Linnell, Choate & Webber v. Heyde (1971)
…she is employed at the Bath Memorial Hospital as a medical records librarian, has no dependent children, is self-supporting and owns her own home. So far as the record discloses, she is willing to pay…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…harm. "A person that owns property is negligent if he or she fails to use reasonable care to keep the property in a reasonably safe condition. A person that owns property must use reasonable care to…