88 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 5 of 5
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
University Ford (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 1080, 1086-1087.) Judge Real granted Crane's motion to dismiss based on his examination of the allegations of the complaint and determination that the complaint did not state…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983 · in the opinion
Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)
…Drass & Kelsey, Eugene Leviton, Jones, Nelson, Sisk & Ford and John A. Haley for Respondents. OPINION KAUFMAN, J. The Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarded death benefits to the widow of Homer Joe Barry, and the Workers' Compensation…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 16, 1987 · in the opinion
Hughes v. Western MacArthur Co. (1987)
…Fire Protection Dist. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 148, 153 \[233 Cal. Rptr. 308, 729 P.2d 743\]; Young v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co. (1985) 168 Cal. App.3d 1037, 1040, fn. 3 \[214 Cal. Rptr. 400\…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · March 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Olds v. 3M Company (2014)
…stated Interrogatories, at Interrogatory Number that Cummins supplied engines with 1 is attached as Exhibit C of Jones Decl. asbestos containing gaskets to OEM truck/tractor manufacturers including International, Ford, Kenworth and Peterbilt. 3. Plaintiff claims…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)
…is essentially an immunity from suit, or whether it is based on a predicate determination the conduct in question is not wrongful under the law. Subsequent cases illustrate this distinction. In Ford v. Polaris Industries, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion
Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)
…4\] Our conclusion is consistent with several public policies strongly reflected in the law, including section 877's objectives of equitably sharing costs among the parties at fault and encouraging settlement. (See Abbott Ford, Inc. v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
… thus, it must be claimed and may be waived \[citation\]."\]; People v. Ford (1988) 45 Cal.3d 431, 439 \["The privilege against self-incrimination is, of course, personal and may be asserted only by the holder…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 27, 2023 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…in the product's use that were known to the supplier but not to the government. Boyle, 487 U.S. at 512; Ford v. Foster Wheeler USA Corp., No. 15-cv-05426-JSW, 2016 WL 551234…