495 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 5 of 25
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)
…those he encountered at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard." (Resp. DCo at 11; Resp. Ford at 12.) In particular, Plaintiffs emphasize that Mr. Jack testified in his deposition that, while he was working at the Shipyard…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Teruel-Armstrong v. Borg-Warner Morsetec, Inc. (2010)
…51 Cal.App.4th 1447; Mileikowsky v. Tenet Healthsystem (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 262; Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1202; see also New Albertsons, supra, 168 Cal.App.4th at…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2013
Finerty v. Abex Corp. (2013)
…referred it to the Special Master, marked Ford Ireland's and Ford England's motions to dismiss off the calendar with leave to reinstate, and denied the motions to stay discovery as moot. A court may…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001
Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)
…Statute of Limitations; Statute of Repose; Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Cummins Engine Company plant; Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Columbus employee of Cummins Engine Company Cummins Engine Company, Inc. Columbus 1942-1978
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…judgment as a matter of law. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company designed, manufactured, and sold motor vehicles during the period from 1975 to 1982. Rehm worked at two Ford plants in Louisville while employed by…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010
Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)
The Superior Court reversed the trial court's summary judgment for Allied Signal and Ford (and the other friction product defendants) and remanded, holding that the trial court wrongly granted the defendants' Frye motion excluding the…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
The Court of Special Appeals reversed the judgments for Coates against Mack Trucks and Ford on negligent failure to warn, and reversed the judgments for CertainTeed on Mack's and Ford's cross-claims, remanding for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
Charlevoix performed clutch and gasket work on Ford vehicles owned by family and friends. (D.I. 216, Ex. 3 at 152:16-19) However, Mr. Milligan could not recall the manufacturer of any clutches or gaskets…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017
Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)
…warn claims, but denied it to Honeywell and Ford on the brake design defect claim, so the plaintiffs' case continued against those two; Ford's sanctions motion was denied. Under Ohio's Product Liability Act, a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · May 28, 2015
Hayes v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2015)
Douglas Hayes sued several companies, including CNH America (sued as Case New Holland), claiming that asbestos exposure caused his mesothelioma. He died after filing, and his sons continued the case as a wrongful death and survival…
-
Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · July 5, 2002
Chavers v. General Motors Corp. (2002)
The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for General Motors, AlliedSignal and Ford, rejecting the claims of Deidra Chavers over her husband's mesothelioma death. Arkansas adopts the 'frequency, regularity, and proximity…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 23, 2018 · in the opinion
Gilbert v. Advance Auto Parts (2018)
…John Price, only gave general deposition testimony that Ford was one of the main brands of vehicles \[Decedent\] worked on. While both of the aforementioned fact witnesses gave general testimony about \[Decedent\] performing brake jobs at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2008
Kummer v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)
The court denied Viacom's summary judgment motion because genuine factual disputes remained on causation, and granted Ford's and GM's unopposed motions, so Mrs. Kummer's claims against Viacom go forward. Under general maritime…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 8, 2018
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Fairbanks, Ford and Goodyear. A party seeking to supplement an expert report after summary judgment must show good cause or excusable neglect, and plaintiffs who never sought leave before judgment was entered did not do so…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · April 15, 2013
Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)
Barbara Bobo sued nine defendants, claiming she developed malignant mesothelioma from asbestos exposure. Seven were dismissed by stipulation, leaving MetLife and the Tennessee Valley Authority. She alleged that she was exposed through contact with…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007
Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)
James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 2018
Chen v. Volkswagen Group of America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…North America's motions for summary judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction, and denied the forum non conveniens motions of those two companies and Ford, so plaintiffs kept their New York forum. A New York court…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
…the appellees (including Allied Chemical, DuPont, Ford, GE, Kentucky Utilities Ghent Powerhouse, LG&E Cane Run and Mill Creek), Louisville millwright Facilities owned by the appellees (including Allied Chemical, DuPont, Ford, GE, Kentucky Utilities Ghent Powerhouse…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022
Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)
…It denied the motion on negligence, because Bienville's two witnesses conflicted on whether the company knew the brakes contained asbestos and that asbestos was dangerous. It also denied the motion on the sophisticated-user defense…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 25, 2023
Jordonek v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…one of first impression under Ohio law, not Delaware law. Ford would remain in the case regardless, and Hennessy gave no evidence that the issue would affect other cases. The court found no benefit that outweighed…