No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

425 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 22

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. Ronald Dummitt v. AW Chesterton (2012)

    …Boeing Co, 654 F3d 852 (9th Cir 2011), cert den 132 SCt 1582 (2012) and Faddish v. General Electric Co., 2010 WL 4146108 (ED Pa 2010), Crane was entitled to the defense. For the reasons below…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hockler v. William Powell Company (2015)

    …631 \[WD Pa 1987\], the court also cited section 402A in holding that "the dismantling and processing of junk electrical components was not a reasonably foreseeable use of \[General Electric Company's\] product" (id. at 635)…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · April 24, 1997 · in the opinion

    Conway v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)

    …Fed.Cir.1985); In re Upjohn Co. Antibiotic Cleocin Products Liability Litigation, 664 F.2d 114, 118 (6th Cir.1981); General Electric Co. v. Byrne, 611 F.2d 670, 673 (7th Cir.1979). Judge Weiner's…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bailen v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2014)

    …A. The same ones as the radios except I did a few Raytheon televisions, not a lot of them. But most of them were the same television sets as the radios, General Electric, Magnavox. Motorola, Philco…

  5. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · February 11, 1997

    Maltese v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 1997)

    …or obvious risk so great that harm is highly probable, with conscious indifference to the outcome. General awareness that high, prolonged asbestos exposure could cause injury did not meet that standard. Failure to Warn; Punitive Damages…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2008

    Nostrom v. Chesterton (2008)

    The court granted summary judgment to Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation and dismissed the Nostrom plaintiffs' Labor Law 241(6) and 200 claims against it. General Industrial Code air-contaminant regulations (12 NYCRR 12-1.4…

  7. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 18, 2010

    Nostrom v. AW Chesterton Co. (2010)

    …Judith Nostrom's Labor Law § 241 (6) claim against the owners (Orange & Rockland, Central Hudson) and the general contractor (Sequoia Ventures), so the defendants won and the plaintiff lost. Vicarious liability under Labor Law § 241 (6)…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Wter Prod. Co. (2014)

    …defendant Appleton Electric LLC ("Appleton") moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross-claims asserted against it on the ground that there is no evidence that plaintiff Stanley Friedman was exposed…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Corp. (2013)

    …breakers, as well as specialty and explosion-proof equipment. Among other things, Mr. Friedman testified that he purchased electrical supplies and equipment from Graybar. In this regard, Mr. Friedman testified as follows (plaintiffs' exhibit B, pp…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2023 · in the opinion

    Rullo v. Abb, Inc. (2023)

    …US, INC., FMC CORPORATION, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION, GEROSA INCORPORATED, GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC, GOULD PUMPS, LLC, GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC., GRINNELL LLC, ITT LLC, INDIVIDUALLY, DOING BUSINESS AS AND SUCCESSOR TO ITT CORPORATION, BELL…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 4, 2013

    Wilson v. 3M Company (2013)

    …a jury must decide, so summary judgment cannot be granted on a motion where the court would have to weigh the testimony. Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery electrician installing fire alarms, switches, and other fire…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 4, 2008

    Nostrom v. Chesterton (2008)

    …Nostrom plaintiffs' Labor Law 241(6) claims against it. In this Department, the general air-contaminant regulations in section 12 of the Industrial Code do not support Labor Law 241(6) liability. Even if they applied…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2008

    Nostrom v. Chesterton (2008)

    …of Donald Nostrom. In the First Department, the Industrial Code air-contaminant sections (12 NYCRR 12-1.4 to 1.6) are general regulations that cannot support Labor Law 241(6) liability. Even if they applied…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 25, 2019

    Lattanzio v. Rockwell Automation (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …not enough. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that cannot be resolved on motion papers. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony Worksites: Columbia Presbyterian Hospital career electrician Columbia Presbyterian Hospital 1968-2010

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 15, 2019

    Czulada v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …the complaint and cross-claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, so the Czulada plaintiffs prevailed on the motion. A New York court has general jurisdiction over a company that was, at the time of the exposure…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 23, 2013

    Fischer v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2013)

    …1950 to 1954 he worked as a civilian draftsman at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, designing radar and electrical installations aboard several Navy ships. He said pumps were everywhere on the ships and that workers repaired them…

  17. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1996

    In re Prudential Lines, Inc. (1996)

    …extrinsic evidence did not resolve the ambiguity in "occurrence", so the term meant the general presence of asbestos on each PLI vessel in each triggered policy period. American Club could apply only one deductible per policy…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018

    Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)

    …Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. 3M Company (2014)

    …him with the asbestos-insulated wires to which he was exposed. Mr. Smith worked as an electrician in the construction industry from 1959 through 2003. In or about March of 2013 he was diagnosed with mesothelioma…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2020 · in the opinion

    Conaway v. ABB (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …the state of Florida. ABB further argues that they are not incorporated in New York and do not maintain their principal place of business here, thus there is no general jurisdiction. Furthermore, ABB contends that Plaintiffs…