No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

86 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 5

  1. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas · January 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    In re United Refining Company (2021)

    … Confirmation Order ¶ 6, at 9. General unsecured creditors were classified under Class VII of the Plan.\[1\] In satisfaction of Class VII claims, the Debtors, among other things, had to pay over $20 million into a…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion

    Gilcrease v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. (2001)

    …Inc., 83 Cal.App.4th 300, 303-04, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 476 (2000); Hall v. General Motors Corp., 229 Mich.App. 580, 582 N.W.2d 866, 871 (1998). \[4\] The Gilcreases also argue Tesoro…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 12, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Schmidt (1996)

    …of the fee against the two minor Schmidt children. Schmidt argues taxing costs against the minor plaintiffs was error because the record does not show good cause for disregarding the general requirement of TEX.R. CIV…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)

    …9 (Tex. App.CHouston \[14th Dist.\] 2004, pet. denied). Foreseeability requires only that the general danger, not the exact sequence of events that produced the harm, be foreseeable. Id. The Texas Supreme Court has frequently stated…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Placid Oil Company (2012)

    …form of notice Placid was required to give the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants to satisfy due process requirements and ultimately discharge their claims. In general, for unknown creditors whose identities and claims are not reasonably ascertainable…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Hearn v. Snapka (2012)

    …is no evidence of one or more essential elements of a claim or defense.") (internal citations, quotations omitted). In general, when a party files a hybrid summary-judgment motion on both no-evidence and traditional grounds…