160 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 8
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007
Rochon v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2007)
…Rochon's employer and landowner duty theories, reversed the dismissal of her general negligence claim, and remanded for further proceedings. A defendant who takes affirmative action creating an unreasonable risk of harm has a duty to…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 25, 2014
Ehlert v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2014)
…liability does not apply. A trial court does not abuse its discretion by giving a general negligence instruction or excluding newspaper articles not shown to be relevant to the defendant's knowledge. Expert Testimony; Failure to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…and makes Volkswagen vehicles, asked to be dismissed because Washington courts lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The court found no general jurisdiction, since Volkswagen AG is neither incorporated nor based in Washington. It also found no…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 30, 2018
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Felts, Inc. (2018)
…call Dr. Arnold Brody, a cellular biologist, to give a general overview of how asbestos fibers affect the lungs and cells. Scapa objected that this would repeat testimony already given by Dr. Carl Brodkin, a physician…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · January 10, 1985
White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)
…barred. The court answered yes. Washington's statutes do not say when a claim accrues, so the general discovery rule applies. A survivor takes the decedent's rights, including the benefit of the discovery rule. Whether…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 31, 1989
Falk v. Keene Corp. (1989)
…by risk-utility balancing and consumer expectations, not ordinary common law negligence; instructions letting the jury apply general negligence instructions to it are reversible error. Design Defect; Trial Procedure and Discovery Navy service 1947 to 1953
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 10, 2018
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)
…a pathologist's tissue analysis, an occupational physician's exposure opinions, a scientist's general testimony on how asbestos causes disease, a historian's account of what was known about asbestos hazards, and studies and videos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 31, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…on the pleadings, arguing the court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The court agreed that Washington had no general jurisdiction over Honeywell because it was neither incorporated nor headquartered there. On specific jurisdiction, the plaintiffs argued…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 31, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…in California, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed that it was not subject to general jurisdiction in Washington because it was not incorporated or headquartered there. On specific jurisdiction, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court found no general jurisdiction because the company was not at home in Washington. It found no specific jurisdiction because the plaintiffs did not allege that the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 22, 2013
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2013)
…found that Crane's two declarations, from a Navy rear admiral and a historian of government documents, gave general information but nothing specific to Crane's products or to Mr. McMann. Crane offered no reasonably precise…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…where the plaintiff's exposure occurred in Toronto. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendant was not at home in Washington. Personal Jurisdiction Worksites: Toronto worked with brakes and clutches on Volkswagen vehicles Toronto 1986-1994
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…employees or agents in Washington. The plaintiffs argued that WCD sold talc to Johnson & Johnson for nationwide distribution in cosmetic products. The court found no general jurisdiction, which the plaintiffs did not dispute. On specific jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 23, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…in Ohio, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed. It found no general jurisdiction, because Dana Companies is neither incorporated nor headquartered in Washington. It found no specific jurisdiction either. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)
at 4-5.) To the extent that this argument overlaps with Scapa's more general argument regarding causation, the court will address the issue in the following section. See infra § III.B.3; (see JMOL Mot…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Clevenger v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
Marchevsky's answered: So basically as we put in the guidelines, in general, it's difficult to tell a sarcoma mesothelioma from other tumors, which is why we went through the trouble of putting together the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…settlement reasonableness hearing because the settling parties never provided the full settlement agreements. An owner does not retain control over an independent contractor's work merely by requiring compliance with safety laws and general safety rules…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion
Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)
…2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 20, 2006
Moore v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2006)
…a worksite, but a jury may not be left to speculate. A general expert opinion that parts from companies "like" the defendant likely contained asbestos, with no specific link to the defendant's products, does not…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 29, 2013
Long v. State Dept. OF Labor and Industries (2013)
…and Industries, and awarded Long attorney fees of $25,249. A worker covered by the federal Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act is excluded from the general provisions of the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, so the…