No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

163 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 9

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 3, 2009

    Hogston v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2009)

    …may be shown by circumstantial evidence, but the evidence must make it probable rather than merely possible. A general distribution area and franchise, without evidence of deliveries to the plant, does not suffice when another distributor…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 3, 2008

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2008)

    …its conduct posed an extreme degree of risk. General knowledge of asbestos risk to employees was not evidence of knowledge of an extreme risk to employees' family members. Expert Testimony; Punitive Damages Worksites: Exxon Baytown refinery…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 4, 2009

    Hogston v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2009)

    …s asbestos product, but it must show probability rather than possibility. A distributor's general franchise territory, without evidence of deliveries to the plant and with direct evidence that another distributor supplied it, does not let…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 1, 2021

    Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …affirmed the judgment for the Leges, including the 51% fault allocation to Birla. A jury's allocation of fault and general damages is reviewed for manifest error or abuse of discretion, and exposure need not be…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1992 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Celotex Corp. (1992)

    …the Tab?, 48 Fordham L.Rev. 657, 684 n. 152 (1980) (quoting Elliott, The New Comprehensive General Liability Policy, in Liability Insurance Disputes 12-3, 12-5 (S. Schreiber ed. 1968)); See also Nothstein, Toxic Torts…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Beckering v. Shell Oil Co. (2014)

    …and fibers, the third factor addressing the "\closeness of the connection' "between Ford's conduct (hiring a general contractor) and the injury to a worker's family member off the premises was "attenuated." (Id. at p…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 23, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hoerner v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2002)

    …indicates that Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. issued a primary commercial general liability policy to Eagle during each of the one-year periods when Home Insurance issued the excess policy. The personal injury limit for the…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)

    …court issue a remittitur for the dollar equivalent of twice the statutory compensation amount (that is, full statutory compensation for Sabetian's loss of his right testicle, and full compensation for impairment of his general health).

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …App.4th 246, 251-254 \[affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor on ground plaintiff lacked evidence he was present when the general contractor's employees performed insulation work likely to release asbestos dust\]; Casey…

  10. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)

    …Liability. The ALI drafting committee and general members of the ALI approved the substance of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (with the exception of two comments not relevant here) in 2005. The…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)

    …914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands · September 27, 1991 · in the opinion

    Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass (1991)

    …no complaint or cross complaint shall specify the amount of damages but shall contain a prayer for general relief and shall state that the damages are within the jurisdictional limits of the court to which the…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …user defense, the ordinary users would have been Davis's employers, not Davis. As support, appellants cite Maneely v. General Motors Corp. (9th Cir. 1997) 108 F.3d 1176. In Maneely, applying California law, the court…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Ulbricht v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (2020)

    …5; Resp. at 5-6.) At issue in both this action and the declaratory judgment action are five commercial general liability policies that the Ulbrichts allege USF&G issued to PM Northwest ("USF&G Policies"). (Compl…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Honer v. Ford Motor Company (2007)

    …fibers. Honer then breathed these asbestos fibers because of her direct and indirect contact with her father and brother themselves as well as their clothes, vehicles, tools and general surroundings. In July 2004, Honer alleged, she…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bourke v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2016)

    …56\] In Poche, the court began with the general premise that "\[a\] case that is initially nonremovable may become removable through the voluntary dismissal of nondiverse defendants."\[57\] All but one of the defendants—Eagle, Inc.…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …to concurrently produce a single injury, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant for the entire injury. Shipp v. General Motors Corporation, 750 F.2d 418, 425-26 (5th Cir.1985). The plaintiff need only show…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Chevron Oronite Company, LLC v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Incorporated (2020)

    …1993) ("In Louisiana. . . civil actions, the plaintiff, in general, has the burden of proving every essential element of his case."). \[26\] See Fontenot, 791 F.2d at 1216-17. Absent such notice, actual, rather than potential…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 25, 1991 · in the opinion

    Moran v. G. & WH Corson, Inc. (1991)

    …with Bob Hinks. Q. About that knowledge? A. A general discussion, a light general thing that I had read about in the paper or, you know, not actually getting into detail. Q. You read about what…

  20. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 2011 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2011)

    …effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…