No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

155 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 8

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2008

    Barnes v. AO Smith Water Products Co. (2008)

    …the Montross, Perdicaro, Enea and Iqbal cases separate, over the defendants' general opposition. Under CPLR 602(a), actions with common questions of law or fact may be tried jointly. The Malcolm factors guide the choice, and…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    …we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 23, 2005 · in the opinion

    IN the Matter of Cammarata v. Caldwell & Cook, Inc. (2005)

    …Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria L.L.P., Buffalo (John A. Collins of counsel), for Sheila Cammarata, respondent. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Estelle Kraushar of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent. Before: Spain, J.P., Carpinello…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 2, 2010 · in the opinion

    In re Grossman's Inc. (2010)

    …somewhat modified approach was taken by the Eleventh Circuit in a case involving the bankruptcy of Piper Aircraft, Inc., a manufacturer of general aviation aircraft and spare aircraft parts. In re Piper, 58 F.3d 1573…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc. (2010)

    …cases of asbestosis and asbestos exposure, such that asbestos exposure in any amount other than general background levels would appear to be causative of mesothelioma,\[4\] we cannot read Borg-Warner, and the test announced therein…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hernandezcueva v. EF Brady Company, Inc. (2015)

    …Id. at pp. 1144-1149). Noting that subcontractors generally work under the supervision of the general contractor, have little control over the project's specifications, and are usually less well capitalized and insured than the developer…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …If the instruction is incomplete or erroneous the trial judge may, as he did here, properly refuse it."'" (Olive v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 804, 813 \[242 Cal.Rptr.3d 15\]…

  8. Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · April 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    Riggs v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2013)

    …P.2d 629, 634 (Utah 1995) ("The general rule regarding statutes of limitations is that the limitation period begins to run [\67] when the last event necessary to complete the cause of action occurs."). In other…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)

    …at 982 F.2d 721 (2d Cir.1992), and the publication of numerous stories in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal — any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns Manville, c.f.…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · November 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Sason v. Dykes Lumber Co., Inc. (2023)

    …a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)'" (Nemeth v Brenntag N. Am…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …which may be as little as three months." Though acknowledging a "general inference that Crocidolite \[asbestos\] is more liable to produce mesothelioma," the report cautioned that "\[e\]xoneration of \[Union Carbide's\] Chrysotile \[asbestos\] has not…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · July 7, 1993 · in the opinion

    Behrendt v. GAF Corp. (1993)

    …fishing, woodworking. Mr. Behrendt's pain symptoms eventually led to a diagnosis of mesothelioma in December 1990. He was taken to the Emergency Room at Community General Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, on December 23, 1990 with a…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2014)

    …It then concluded that the only evidence plaintiffs had on causation was Dr. Mark's "general causation" opinion (that exposure to asbestos causes mesothelioma) and that opinion did not "carry the day." On January 29, 2013…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …to \determine whether, as a matter of logic, the studies and other information cited by experts adequately support the conclusion that the expert's general theory or technique is valid.'" (Sargon, supra, 55 Cal.4th at…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion

    Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)

    …s expert witness, Dr. Staggs.\[19\] Both experts testify to general and specific causation. Woodward contends that both experts' specific causation opinions are unreliable because they are premised on unreliable facts.\[20\] Second, Woodward moves for…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · March 31, 2025 · in the opinion

    Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. (2025)

    …such determinations should be driven by the contract language—language that obviously may vary from policy to policy." Id. at 30. That caveat accords with the general rule that "\[i\]nsurance policies are written contracts, and…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …which may be as little as three months." Though acknowledging a "general inference that Crocidolite \[asbestos\] is more liable to produce mesothelioma," the report cautioned that "\[e\]xoneration of \[Union Carbide's\] Chrysotile \[asbestos\] has not…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …702(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, nor do they satisfy the Daubert factors, including "testability," "peer review," and "general acceptance" within the "relevant scientific community," Bresler, 855 F.3d at 195. On the contrary…

  20. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …jury instructions pertaining to the duty to warn. Aubin requested the trial court to include a general instruction that Union Carbide had the duty to warn the end user, while Union Carbide asserted that it was…