No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

130 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 5 of 7

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 9, 2024

    Caligiuri v. AO Smith Corp. (2024)

    …establish that its product could not have contributed to the plaintiff's injury; competing expert causation evidence raises a question of fact that precludes summary judgment. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony scraping and cleaning pizza ovens

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 29, 2015

    Moore v. AERCO Int'l (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …granted the motion and put the cases into three groups for joint trial. Group 1 is Harry Moore, Earl Skinnider and Owen Traynor. Group 2 is Onorato Balacich and Salvator Murabito. Group 3 is George Birrell…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 6, 2025

    Kirby v. David Fabricators OF NY, Inc. (2025)

    …restaurants from the 1960s to the 1980s and alleges he developed mesothelioma from asbestos coming from transite stone boards that the defendant supplied and that were associated with pizza ovens made by Bakers Pride Oven Company…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2024

    Savianeso v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2024)

    …Pride met that burden and plaintiff's expert, who did not quantify the secondhand exposure, did not raise a factual issue. Causation; Expert Testimony; Take-Home Exposure brother of a worker who used Bakers Pride ovens

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)

    In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…

  6. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 27, 2005

    Holdampf v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig, 2005)

    …lost. Under New York law, an employer or landowner owes no duty of care to an employee's household member allegedly injured by asbestos dust brought home on work clothes, because no relationship between the defendant…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2006

    8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (2006)

    …the New York Court of Appeals' duty analysis, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure absent a relationship with her, and OSHA regulations create no private right of…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 2021

    Smith v. AC Light. & Elec. Supplies, LLC (2021)

    …200 and common-law negligence, a premises owner or contractor owes a duty to provide a safe workplace only if it had authority to supervise or control the activity causing the injury; evidence that it oversaw…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Genuine Parts Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2007 · in the opinion

    Lasky v. 63 West 38th Street, LLC (2007)

    …Plaintiff is the operator of dental services for union members and their eligible dependents. The defendant owns the building occupied by plaintiff, and is engaging in substantial renovation in connection with the conversion of the building…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Grabowski v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Fogel v. American Int'l Indus. for Clubman (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)

    …issue of apparent first impression: whether a plaintiff is entitled to be placed in an in extremis cluster or must be transferred to a FIFO cluster where plaintiff alleges exposure to asbestos from ovens in Queens…

  13. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)

    …to enable the manufacturer's product to function as intended" (majority op at 778). I believe this test opens too broad an avenue of potential liability and that, in line with our precedent in this area…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Unterberg v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp. (2016)

    …is not enough that related corporations have the same officers and directors, or that the a parent corporation owns all of its subsidiary's stock, or even that a parent and subsidiary hold themselves out as…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · August 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Tycz v. Asbeka Industries OF New York, Inc. (2012)

    …business with one another. It further notes that although Niagara may have been the exclusive supplier of Johns Manville products, Blodgett did not engage local entities to supply ovens to customers. Moreover, documents relied on by…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Holley Performance Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 24, 2019 · in the opinion

    Djokic v. Steel Grip (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …at the U.S. Steel facility varied, he worked as a laborer, garbage collector, and lab worker, he worked in the coke ovens and soaking pits (Opp. Exh. 1, pgs. 62-63, 158-160 and 200…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bernard v. Brookfield Props. Corp. (2011)

    …were not extinguished insofar as same would have denied her due process, and in light of NWSC's admission that it currently owns the Building, there remain outstanding issues of fact as to NWSC's status…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 21, 2008 · in the opinion

    Early v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2008)

    …Grumman Aircraft Corp. From 1965 through 1993, he worked as a millwright, maintaining machinery, including presses, ovens, boilers, pumps, and valves. He worked in the boiler room and assisted in dismantling the boiler room, which he…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Leavitt v. Rogers Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …