No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

94 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 5 of 5

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Saffold v. Bondex International, Inc. (2011)

    …before damages can be allotted to it." (Wilson v. Ritto (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 361, 369; Sparks v Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478 \[defendant manufacturer of asbestos-containing product "undisputedly…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …Id. Rather than find that the duty to warn extended by way of an intermediary, the Court instead required a relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. Cf. Adams v. Owens-Illinois, 119 Md. App. 395, 411…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)

    …tortfeasors, we "resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of respondent, and indulge all legitimate and reasonable inferences in support of the judgment." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 471…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 18, 2019

    Lewis v. QCP (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …raises credibility issues that cannot be resolved on papers. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens, New York plumber Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens New York 1955-1965

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)

    …at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  6. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…

  7. Medical study · Medical research · 2021

    Functionalized Scintillating Nanotubes for Simultaneous Radio- and Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer

    …of delivered doses comparable to the one employed in clinical treatments. This opens the possibility of effectively reducing the therapy exposure and consequently undesired collateral effects due to prolonged exposure of patients to high-energy radiation.

  8. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …tenet of negligence law, stating that "Tennessee law currently provides that one owes a duty to refrain from engaging in conduct that creates an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm to others." Satterfield, 266 S.W…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 16, 2024 · in the opinion

    Sorrentino v. Ammco Tools, Inc. (2024)

    …industry custom or feasibility of design can be considered when the plaintiff opens the door by "present\[ing\] evidence that puts in issue the custom of the industry or feasibility of alternative design" as "the defendant…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …user is later injured. See Davis, 975 F.2d at 173 (noting that "no Louisiana case has clearly addressed the issue" of whether a "product manufacturer owes \[a\] duty to the employee\[s\] of a purchaser. . …

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 24, 2019 · in the opinion

    Djokic v. Steel Grip (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …at the U.S. Steel facility varied, he worked as a laborer, garbage collector, and lab worker, he worked in the coke ovens and soaking pits (Opp. Exh. 1, pgs. 62-63, 158-160 and 200…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Leavitt v. Rogers Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)

    …Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day, Alaska, 594 P.2d 38, 47 (1979); Owen, Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation, 74 Mich.L.Rev. 1257, 1277-1299 (1976). See also State ex. rel. Young v. Crookham…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …the boilers, not A & K. Alexander testified that even fiberglass insulation creates some dust when it is cut. Claimant also alleges that he was exposed to asbestos through the welding blankets used at the plant. Claimant…