111 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 5 of 6
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 13, 2006 · in the opinion
Bartel EX rel. Estate, Rich v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr. (2006)
…The majority of these cases concerned shipyard workers who worked on ships while in the shipyard on land, as well as at sea.\[2\] Of these cases, only Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United States District Court…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 4, 2001 · in the opinion
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2001)
…causation and damages. The sine qua non for the accrual of a cause of action is damages. Owens v. Martin, 449 So.2d 448 (La.1984). We understand the unique nature of asbestos cases and the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion
Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)
…particular product was a legal cause of a plaintiff's injury, the plaintiff must satisfy the two-part test enunciated by the Supreme Court in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
…190 Cal.App.4th at p. 33.) Appellants rely on Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461 (Sparks) and Stewart to argue that John Crane did not bear its burden of providing…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)
…the Court of Appeals and hold the trial court erred by dismissing Lunsford's strict product liability claims [\1104] against Saberhagen. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: SUSAN OWENS, CHARLES W…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016
Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)
…and Goulds Pumps, ending the plaintiff's claims over Owen Holland's mesothelioma death. Under Alabama law a plaintiff must first prove exposure to an asbestos-containing product for which the defendant is responsible. Evidence that…
-
Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · April 5, 2012
One Beacon American v. Huntsman Polymers (2012)
…based on the expected place of payment and the location of the insured risk. It also found Texas law applies the exposure trigger to progressive-disease bodily injury, so One Beacon owes 100% of the costs.
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009
Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)
…claim. Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse absent a legally significant special relationship for a nonfeasance claim, and a party cannot argue on appeal a misfeasance…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008
Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)
…Georgia-Pacific, so the widow lost on both claims. An owner who hires an independent contractor owes a duty to the contractor's employee only if it retained control over how the work was done; general…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017
Kivell v. Murphy Oil USA (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…strict liability claims brought by Sandra Kivell, so the plaintiff lost. Under Louisiana law, a premises owner owes no duty for hazards inherent in an independent contractor's work, and strict liability requires custody, meaning direction…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021
Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)
…defendants, holding they owed no duty of care to Khosravan, and awarded respondents their costs on appeal. A defendant owes no duty to protect workers from asbestos at premises it did not own, possess or control…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)
…during the relevant period. Under Texas foreseeability principles, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure before the risk was foreseeable; unreliable case reports did not make the risk…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2019
Malek v. Chevron U.S.A. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)
…was not a joint venturer or principal of the operator, and did not undertake responsibility for worker safety owes no duty of care; workers who only incidentally benefit from a contract are not intended third party…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · September 4, 2013
Barile v. 3M Company, Inc. (2013)
…made by others. A landowner owes no duty to protect an independent contractor's workers from hazards inherent in the contracted work unless it controls the means and methods of that work. Statute of Repose; Failure…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 1, 2014
Smith v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…plaintiff Miriam Smith's direct negligence claims. Under Louisiana law, a premises owner owes a direct duty of reasonable care to a contractor's employees, and a fact issue on breach can exist without proof the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020
Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)
…favor of the Exxon defendants. A defendant that did not own, possess or control the premises owes no premises or negligence duty to workers there, and a guarantee in a contract not intended to benefit the…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 2005
Zimko v. American Cyanamid (2005)
…maintaining a dangerous asbestos workplace is only negligence. An employer owes a duty of reasonable care to household members of employees exposed to asbestos carried home on the employee's clothing or person. Causation; Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)
…or third party claim" and "Property owner" as "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes"). We note that our sister court has recently issued a plurality opinion questioning…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheller, LLC (2010)
…status and location of the property is also a significant factor. If the property is owned by the same entity that owns the real property, this suggests that the property may be an improvement to real…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…USF&G, Defendants contend, "has thus far refused to pay anything towards the accrued interest" and therefore "owes at least $171,172.60" in interest on the $4.5 million covenant judgment. (Id.) However, the record…