113 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 5 of 6
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)
…the Court of Appeals and hold the trial court erred by dismissing Lunsford's strict product liability claims [\1104] against Saberhagen. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: SUSAN OWENS, CHARLES W…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Haldaman v. Eaton Corporation (2014)
…the records in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolve any doubts as to the existence of a genuine issue of material fact against the moving party." Burger v. Owens Illinois, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)
…PRAC. & PROC.§ 3733 (Rev. 4th ed.)(citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014)(in context of diversity removal, only a "plausible" allegation of amount in controversy is required))…
-
Court case · North Dakota Supreme Court · January 14, 2016 · in the opinion
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc. (2016)
…corporation; OakFabCo, Inc. f/k/a Kewanee Boiler Corporation an Illinois corporation; The Okonite Company, Inc., a New Jersey corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc., an Ohio corporation; Parker Boiler Co., a California corporation; Paul A. Douden, a…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…Id. Rather than find that the duty to warn extended by way of an intermediary, the Court instead required a relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. Cf. Adams v. Owens-Illinois, 119 Md. App. 395, 411…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Barr v. Parker-Hannifin Corp. (2020)
…no evidence that Kleinberg was ever exposed to asbestos or that he brought asbestos home on his clothing. Without evidence of exposure there is no causation. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…context of products liability actions, the plaintiff must prove that the defective products supplied by the defendant were a substantial factor in bringing about his or her injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion
Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)
…tortfeasors, we "resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of respondent, and indulge all legitimate and reasonable inferences in support of the judgment." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 471…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · June 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Petrie v. Novelis Corporation (2021)
…evidence of a quantified defendant-specific dose sufficient to show a doubling of the risk of contracting mesothelioma is not required. See ECF 58 at 16 (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Loupe v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2016)
…C. & Rebecca Abbott Zotti, Frilot L.L.C.. Uniroyal, Inc., Defendant, represented by Forrest Ren Wilkes, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC. Owens-Illinois, Inc., represented by Forrest Ren Wilkes, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC, Walter G. Watkins, III…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)
In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion
Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)
…pollution exclusion applies in this case, then INA owes no coverage for the Cotter suit and ZAIC could not seek contribution or subrogation against INA as a matter of law. ZAIC responds that INA failed to…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009
Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)
…claim. Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse absent a legally significant special relationship for a nonfeasance claim, and a party cannot argue on appeal a misfeasance…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 27, 2007
Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)
…that they take nothing against Alcoa, because Alcoa owed no legal duty. An employer owes no legal duty for take-home asbestos exposure unless the risk was foreseeable at the time; in the 1950s the danger…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)
…during the relevant period. Under Texas foreseeability principles, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure before the risk was foreseeable; unreliable case reports did not make the risk…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 27, 2005
Holdampf v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig, 2005)
…lost. Under New York law, an employer or landowner owes no duty of care to an employee's household member allegedly injured by asbestos dust brought home on work clothes, because no relationship between the defendant…
-
Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · January 16, 2008
Fossen v. Midamerican Energy Company (2008)
…of harm and public policy; on that analysis a landowner owes no duty to the spouse of an independent contractor's employee who carried asbestos fibers home from the premises. Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 5, 2009
Adams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)
…on the owner's property refers to the origin of the asbestos. A premises owner owes no duty of care to a person not exposed on its premises, so take-home claims fail. Premises Owner Liability…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2006
8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (2006)
…the New York Court of Appeals' duty analysis, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure absent a relationship with her, and OSHA regulations create no private right of…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012
Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)
…the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…