No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

131 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 5 of 7

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Nesbiet v. General Electric Co. (2005)

    …Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.,\[59\] which involved a failure-to-warn claim arising from the plaintiffs' exposure to asbestos at a job site where the defendants manufactured various products for the federal government, the…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    DeMartino v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …Grace & Co.-Conn, 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    Holdampf v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2004)

    …the defendants' motions for summary judgment, and the defendants based their appellate argument on the Widera rationale that an employer owes no duty of care to non-employees for injuries occurring off-premises (id. at 752)…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assoc. (2012)

    …NY2d 818 \[1999\], cert den sub nom Worthington Corp v. Ronsini, 529 US 1019 \[2000\]); Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp, 221 AD2d 830 \[3rd Dept 1995\]; Bigelow v. Acands, Inc, 196 AD2d 436 \[1st Dept…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 18, 2019

    Lewis v. QCP (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …raises credibility issues that cannot be resolved on papers. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens, New York plumber Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens New York 1955-1965

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 9, 2024

    Caligiuri v. AO Smith Corp. (2024)

    …establish that its product could not have contributed to the plaintiff's injury; competing expert causation evidence raises a question of fact that precludes summary judgment. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony scraping and cleaning pizza ovens

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 29, 2015

    Moore v. AERCO Int'l (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …granted the motion and put the cases into three groups for joint trial. Group 1 is Harry Moore, Earl Skinnider and Owen Traynor. Group 2 is Onorato Balacich and Salvator Murabito. Group 3 is George Birrell…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2024

    Savianeso v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2024)

    …Pride met that burden and plaintiff's expert, who did not quantify the secondhand exposure, did not raise a factual issue. Causation; Expert Testimony; Take-Home Exposure brother of a worker who used Bakers Pride ovens

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)

    In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2006

    8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (2006)

    …the New York Court of Appeals' duty analysis, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure absent a relationship with her, and OSHA regulations create no private right of…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 2021

    Smith v. AC Light. & Elec. Supplies, LLC (2021)

    …200 and common-law negligence, a premises owner or contractor owes a duty to provide a safe workplace only if it had authority to supervise or control the activity causing the injury; evidence that it oversaw…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Genuine Parts Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2007 · in the opinion

    Lasky v. 63 West 38th Street, LLC (2007)

    …Plaintiff is the operator of dental services for union members and their eligible dependents. The defendant owns the building occupied by plaintiff, and is engaging in substantial renovation in connection with the conversion of the building…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Grabowski v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Fogel v. American Int'l Indus. for Clubman (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)

    …issue of apparent first impression: whether a plaintiff is entitled to be placed in an in extremis cluster or must be transferred to a FIFO cluster where plaintiff alleges exposure to asbestos from ovens in Queens…

  16. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)

    …to enable the manufacturer's product to function as intended" (majority op at 778). I believe this test opens too broad an avenue of potential liability and that, in line with our precedent in this area…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Unterberg v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp. (2016)

    …is not enough that related corporations have the same officers and directors, or that the a parent corporation owns all of its subsidiary's stock, or even that a parent and subsidiary hold themselves out as…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · August 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Tycz v. Asbeka Industries OF New York, Inc. (2012)

    …business with one another. It further notes that although Niagara may have been the exclusive supplier of Johns Manville products, Blodgett did not engage local entities to supply ovens to customers. Moreover, documents relied on by…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 24, 2019 · in the opinion

    Djokic v. Steel Grip (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …at the U.S. Steel facility varied, he worked as a laborer, garbage collector, and lab worker, he worked in the coke ovens and soaking pits (Opp. Exh. 1, pgs. 62-63, 158-160 and 200…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bernard v. Brookfield Props. Corp. (2011)

    …were not extinguished insofar as same would have denied her due process, and in light of NWSC's admission that it currently owns the Building, there remain outstanding issues of fact as to NWSC's status…