No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

112 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 5 of 6

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Aurora Pump Co., 2004 WL 2222935, at [\1] (Conn. Super. Sept. 14, 2004) (quoting Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989)). "The plaintiff must produce evidence sufficient to…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Wagner v. Standard Steel, Lcc (2017)

    …the subsequent cases interpreting it, In re: Grossman's Inc., 607 F.3d 114 (3d Cir. 2010) (en banc), and Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101 (3d Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S.Ct…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 292, 332.) III. Section 3294 Punitive damages serve the dual public purposes of punishment and deterrence. (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658; see § 3294…

  4. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company (2008)

    …Cyanamid, 905 So. 2d 465, 483-84 (La. Ct. App. 2005). \[60\] Olivo v. Owens-Ill., Inc., 895 A.2d 1143, 1148-50 (N.J. 2006). \[61\] Condon v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 2004 WL…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    …in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…

  6. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …the Court of Appeals and hold the trial court erred by dismissing Lunsford's strict product liability claims [\1104] against Saberhagen. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: SUSAN OWENS, CHARLES W…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …to asbestos to members of an employee's household. J-MM argued that the trial court should "similarly find that J-MM owes no legal duty" to Cornelius, because he was not a member of Nathan…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …PRAC. & PROC.§ 3733 (Rev. 4th ed.)(citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014)(in context of diversity removal, only a "plausible" allegation of amount in controversy is required))…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)

    …Brooks now moves for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' products liability and negligence claims contending it owes no duty to warn or duty of care to Plaintiffs.\[2\] The Court has addressed by…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 31, 2010 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2010)

    …on Navy ships at Lockheed for another contractor, either Unicor, Incorporated, or Owens Corning.\[3\] Reuben was a member of the insulators workers' union. Reuben was never a Lockheed employee. ¶ 3 Insulators at Lockheed's shipyard…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    Holdampf v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2004)

    …the defendants' motions for summary judgment, and the defendants based their appellate argument on the Widera rationale that an employer owes no duty of care to non-employees for injuries occurring off-premises (id. at 752)…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)

    …that it was more likely than not that Medina was exposed to asbestos at ASARCO. Plaintiffs argue that Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 \[33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702\] (Dumin)…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)

    In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)

    …pollution exclusion applies in this case, then INA owes no coverage for the Cotter suit and ZAIC could not seek contribution or subrogation against INA as a matter of law. ZAIC responds that INA failed to…

  15. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009

    Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)

    …claim. Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse absent a legally significant special relationship for a nonfeasance claim, and a party cannot argue on appeal a misfeasance…

  16. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 27, 2007

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …that they take nothing against Alcoa, because Alcoa owed no legal duty. An employer owes no legal duty for take-home asbestos exposure unless the risk was foreseeable at the time; in the 1950s the danger…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)

    …during the relevant period. Under Texas foreseeability principles, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure before the risk was foreseeable; unreliable case reports did not make the risk…

  18. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · January 16, 2008

    Fossen v. Midamerican Energy Company (2008)

    …of harm and public policy; on that analysis a landowner owes no duty to the spouse of an independent contractor's employee who carried asbestos fibers home from the premises. Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability…

  19. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 5, 2009

    Adams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2009)

    …on the owner's property refers to the origin of the asbestos. A premises owner owes no duty of care to a person not exposed on its premises, so take-home claims fail. Premises Owner Liability…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2006

    8th Jud Dist Asbestos Litig (2006)

    …the New York Court of Appeals' duty analysis, an employer owes no duty to an employee's spouse for take-home asbestos exposure absent a relationship with her, and OSHA regulations create no private right of…