96 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 5 of 5
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2012 · in the opinion
Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2012)
…could conceivably encounter. Imposing such an obligation would render all the warnings given virtually meaningless: "To warn of all potential dangers would warn of nothing." Andre v. Union Tank Car Co., 213 N.J.Super. 51…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Simonetta v. Viad Corporation (2008)
…Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner & Pree 1001 4th Ave Ste 3900, Seattle, WA, 98154-1051 Amicus Curiae on behalf of Flowserve Corporation Jeanne F. Loftis, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC 300 Pioneer Tower, 888 Sw Fifth Avenue Portland…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)
…PACIFIC PUMPS and BYRON JACKSON PUMP COMPANY); FRYER-KNOWLES, INC.; FRYER-KNOWLES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION; GARDNER DENVER, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to JOY MANUFACTURING COMPANY); GARDNER DENVER NASH, L.L.C…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 18, 2008 · in the opinion
Payne v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2008)
…and GR. A merger or consolidation occurs when there is a union between two or more corporations that results in either the absorption of one by the other or the creation of a new corporation. After…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…supplemented, and the entity is not irrevocably bound to what the fairly prepared and candid designated deponent happens to remember during the testimony." Snapp v. United Transp. Union, 889 F.3d 1088, 1103-04 (9th Cir…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 10, 2019 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
SHERRI L. DEEM, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of THOMAS A. DEEM, deceased, Plaintiff, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, etal., Defendants. Case No. C17-5965 BHS. June 10, 2019. United States District Court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2015 · in the opinion
Sprague v. Pfizer, Inc. (2015)
…960 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting Lewis v. Tel. Employees Credit Union, 87 F.3d 1537, 1545 (9th Cir.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted)). The Washington State Supreme Court has not addressed whether it would adopt Restatement…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2021 · in the opinion
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…WINELAND, Individually, and SUSAN WINELAND, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN DALE WINELAND, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, etal., Defendants. Cause No. C19-0793RSL. May 17, 2021. United States District Court, W…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 23, 2017 · in the opinion
Jack v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2017)
PATRICK JACK, etal., Plaintiffs, v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD., etal., Defendants. Case No. C17-0537JLR. October 23, 2017. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle. Patrick Jack, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin H. Adams, DEAN OMAR & BRANHAM…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)
…TEC INC., (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BORGWARNER CORPORATION); CATERPILLAR GLOBAL MINING, LLC (sued individually and as a successor-in-interest to BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL f/k/a BUCYRUS-ERIE CO.); CERTAINTEED CORPORATION; DANA…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Strong v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)
…claim that Plaintiff actually controls or possesses the documents sought. See, e.g., United States v. Int'l Union of Petroleum & Indus. Workers, 870 F.2d 1450, 1453-54 (9th Cir. 1989) (defining "control" as "the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…factor test, the plaintiff must demonstrate "a high enough level of exposure that an inference that the asbestos was a substantial factor in the injury is more than conjectural." Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Hoyt v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Company (2013)
…Puget Sound Bridge and Dry Dock caused her to develop mesothelioma. She brings this action for damages for personal injuries against Lockheed Shipbuilding Company, the successor-in-interest to Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Corporation. Id. at …
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · April 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp. (1989)
…1966) (issue of damages, here primarily noneconomic, is within the jury's province); Power v. Union Pac. R.R., 655 [\647] F.2d 1380, 1388 (9th Cir.1981) (under Washington law, damages for loss of companionship…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Welch v. Crane Co. (2023)
…Plaintiff, v. Crane Co. Individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO. and DEMING PUMPS; and VELAN VALVE CORPORATION, Defendants. Case No. 2:22-cv-00302-RAJ. July 6, 2023. United States District Court…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion
Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)
…respondents. \[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals March 6, 1991.\] GROSSE, C.J. The Celotex Corporation\[1\] and Raymark Industries, Inc. (collectively referred to as appellants) appeal a jury verdict and award to…