98 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 5 of 5
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · June 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)
…so, "the precedents going back over a hundred and fifty years establish that any claim, even one created by state law, against a federally created corporation arises under federal law." Monsanto Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)
…in fact, including the requirement that the defendant's conduct or product be a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff's injuries.'" Flores, 232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Standard Steel, Lcc (2017)
…41 A.3d 882, 886 n.3 (Pa. Super. 2012); see also Kleban v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 771 A.2d 39, 43 (Pa. Super. 2001) ("While we recognize that federal court decisions…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)
…not the test under Pennsylvania law as the Court must look to "whether the harm to \[plaintiff\] was foreseeable in the first instance." Commerce Bank/Pennsylvania v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 911 A.2d 133…
-
Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)
…lack of dust control may have caused the eventual injury to Barbara— PacifiCorp may have violated its duty of care to Barbara. Cf. Condon v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 2004 WL 1932847, at [\4] (Cal…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion
Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company, Inc. (2007)
…known of asbestos dust at its Tennessee facilities since the 1940's. The level of asbestos dust at its facilities in 1968 were allegedly so high that Alcoa received complaints from the workers' union. In 1965…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 22, 2024 · in the opinion
Lagrange v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)
…is currently weighing whether non-bankruptcy claims can proceed against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, the insurer of Hopeman and Hopeman subsidiary Wayne Manufacturing Corporation. Liberty Mutual and Wayne are also parties to this asbestos litigation. In…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion
ACandS v. Abate (1998)
…About two years after the symptoms began, Ciotta received a letter from his trade union regarding asbestos-exposure and was urged to have a chest X-ray. Ciotta got the X-ray and the doctors recommended…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion
Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)
…A., 40 F.3d 622, 631 (3d Cir. 1994); see also Earles v. Union Barge Line Corp., 486 F.2d 1097, 1102 (3d Cir. 1973). "Maritime law has incorporated the doctrines of strict liability and negligence…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · November 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America (2016)
…the obligation has just now become definitely determined under the plain meaning of the insurance policy. Alternatively, ZAIC relies on the Eighth Circuit case Continental Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…contractors who supervised the workers, and union officials.'" Appellants misconstrue the "feasibility" discussion in Farrar. First, the Court never stated that the feasibility of the warning depended on the ability of the manufacturer to warn an…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion
Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)
…should have been aware, of the danger to household members at the time. See Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 965 F.2d 844 (10th Cir.1992) (applying Oklahoma law); Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…factor test, the plaintiff must demonstrate "a high enough level of exposure that an inference that the asbestos was a substantial factor in the injury is more than conjectural." Stephens v. Union Pac. R.R. Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…the state of domicile is the one concerned with administration of estates, including the adequacy of compensation to the beneficiaries"). IPC is a Delaware corporation. IPC conducted business in the state of Oklahoma through its predecessor…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)
…Dr. Selikoff and his colleagues also presented a second paper at the New York conference: "Neoplasia Among Insulation Workers." These studies examined insulation workers who were members of the North American Asbestos Worker's Union. In…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Loupe v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2016)
…M. Zanovec, Willingham Fultz & Cougill, Jeanette Seraile-Riggins, Manion Gaynor Manning LLP & Jennifer D. Zajac, Willingham Fultz & Cougill. McCarty Corporation, Successor to McCarty Branton, Inc., and Predecessor and Successor to McCarty Insulation Sales, Inc, Defendant, represented…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 28, 2012 · in the opinion
Hearn v. Snapka (2012)
…Furthermore, even before Borg-Warner, the Texas Supreme Court held that causation requires proof that a "defendant's conduct or product be a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff's injuries." Union Pump Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · December 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Amick v. Ohio Power Company (2013)
…W.Va. Mar. 21, 2012). In contrast, courts in the Fourth Circuit have generally declined to recognize a federal settlement privilege. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Porter Hayden Co., Case No. CCB…