No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

235 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 12

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hassell v. The Budd Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2016)

    …As amended in 1915, however, the LIA included a "general" power that "extend\[ed\] to the design, the construction, and the material of every part of the locomotive and tender and of all appurtenances." 272 U…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …he performed automotive repairs and, from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, he used brakes from Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Pep Boys, and NAPA stores. Deposition of Jon Burger, dated 3/29/06…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    McCloskey v. Cemline Corporation (2015)

    …DECEASED, AND PATRICIA PARTNER, IN HER OWN RIGHT, Appellants, v. CEMLINE CORPORATION, CERRO WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC., THE LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, MADDEN BOILER WORKS, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., PPG AUTO GLASS…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. AO Smith Corporation (2016)

    …CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HERCULES INC; COLUMBUS MCKINNON…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · January 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    Geier v. Board OF Public Education OF School District OF Pittsburgh (2017)

    …Sellers. PBE further argues that Plaintiffs must allege that the dangerous condition causing the injury must be "of the facilities of steam, water, gas or electric" and "located within rights of way." 42 Pa. C.S. …

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2002 · in the opinion

    Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2002)

    …Company, Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens Brockway Glass Container, Inc., Studebaker Worthington, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Inc., WR Grace & Co., Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Fibreboard Corp., GAF Corporation. Appeal of: John Crane, Inc., Appellant…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …of trial, the court barred the defendant from putting into evidence a publication of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) setting forth standards respecting the manufacture of electric hoists and other industrial lifting equipment. The…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 24, 2023 · in the opinion

    Pine v. John Crane, Inc. (2023)

    …2014)); Scarborough v. Clemco Industries, 391 F.3d 660 (5th Cir. 2004) (seaman may not recover punitive damages in a general maritime law claim against third-party non-employer); cf. Townsend, 557 U.S. at 404…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 24, 1993 · in the opinion

    Today's Exp., Inc. v. Barkan (1993)

    …all units are in the same general condition as those units which have been inspected, and that the conditon \[sic\] of the building, roof and gutters, and heating, plumbing and electrical systems is satisfactory to Buyer…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smeal v. Clark Equipment Company (2022)

    …For the following reasons, I will deny both Motions for Summary Judgment. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND For purposes of general background, the following facts are derived from the evidence submitted by the parties. Where there is conflicting…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 30, 1999 · in the opinion

    Baker v. AC&S, Inc. (1999)

    …v. Gamble, 201 Pa. 289, 50 A. 971 (1902); Turton v. Powelton Electric Co., 185 Pa. 406, 39 A. 1053 (1898). Thus, "\[e\]ven if two parties were equally responsible for the plaintiff's injury, one…

  12. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 16, 2015 · in the opinion

    In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2015)

    …steel, aluminum, and glass manufacturing and electric power production industries. 4.7(b)(3) Exposure Evidence. The NARCO Asbestos Trust may consider as evidence an affidavit of the claimant, an affidavit of one or more Co…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 10, 2012 · in the opinion

    Tooey v. AK Steel Corporation (2012)

    …A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; CBS CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS VIACOM, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY; GRINNELL CORPORATION; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.;…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Wagers v. Sgl Carbon, LLC (2011)

    …Inc. to perform the siding and roof installation on building number 24. (Id. at 2-3.) There was no general contractor on this project. The contract between Siding, Inc. and SGL specified for the use of…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Curry v. American Standard (2010)

    …no. 56 at 1). Second, Buffalo argues that Mr. Curry's testimony that most pumps were replaced on the Kitty Hawk is over-general, speculation, and insufficient to create an issue of fact. (Id.) Third, there…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …the court must consider all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. White v. Westinghouse Electric Company, 862 F.2d 56, 59 (3d Cir.1988). Evidentiary issues Defendants contend that: (1) plaintiff…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 13, 2006 · in the opinion

    Chenot v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2006)

    …and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger. Pennsylvania law imposes no general duty on property owners to prepare and maintain a safe building for the benefit of a contractor's…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 27, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Bmw OF North America LLC (2014)

    …same vein, in Burch, the fact Sears sold an electric power mower under its own brand name, "Craftsman," weighed in favor of holding Sears liable although it was not the manufacturer of the mower. Burch v…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Smith v. AO Smith Corp. (2022)

    …However, these four companies were engaged in engineering design, facility and property management services, electrical contracting, and equipment rental—distinct lines of business from the plumbing and mechanical contracting work of Schneider, Inc. and Pittsburgh Mechanical…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · March 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2018)

    …4.) Specifically, Mr. Gorton performed "brake jobs, minor repairs, electrical repairs, and even pump\[ed\]...gas." (ECF No. 230-2 at 2, 5.) Mr. Gorton while employed by Olson Brothers performed "\[p\]robably a half a…