160 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 8
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 7, 2024
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…Navy asbestos directives were mandatory and followed preclude dismissal. Under Washington law, duty turns on foreseeability of a general field of danger, and disputed expert evidence on substantial-factor causation precludes summary judgment. Causation; Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2012
Bouchard v. CBS Corporation (2012)
…the agreement did not assume tort liability for asbestos exposure. Washington's general rule is that an asset purchaser is not liable for the seller's liabilities unless an exception applies. Take-Home Exposure; Successor Liability…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…Dkt. \# 146) at 12 ("The medical literature has established malignant mesothelioma. . . as, in general, a dose response disease, that is, each exposure to asbestos-containing dust has been shown to contribute to cause diffuse malignant mesothelioma. …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 1, 2022 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Akebono Brake Corporation (2022)
…and that it should be construed, not as a grant of power to make broad and general rules, but as a limitation upon the courts requiring that the customary rules having to do with the minutiæ…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Advance Environmental Inc. v. Director Washington State Department OF Labor and Industries (2017)
…Judgment or order under review, Date filed: 02/10/2016, Judge signing: Honorable L. Gene Middaugh. Anastasia R. Sandstrom, Attorney General's Office, 800 5th Ave Ste 2000, Seattle, WA, 98104-3188, Counsel for Appellant(s…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Monlux v. 3M Company (2024)
…1-2, 1-3. Both versions of the complaint contain only general allegations against Foster Wheeler without identifying what specific product allegedly injured Mr. Monlux at Lockheed Shipyard. Foster Wheeler notes that both versions of the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 17, 2013 · in the opinion
Apcompower Inc. v. State, Department OF Labor and Industries (2013)
…OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Appellant. No. 43104-1-II. Filed: December 17, 2013. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two. Sarah Kortokrax, Attorney General's office, Po Box 40121, Olympia, WA, 98504-0121, Counsel for Appellant…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · November 17, 1994 · in the opinion
Kilpatrick v. Dept. of Labor and Industries (1994)
…William D. Hochberg and Joel J. Delman, for appellants. Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General, and John R. Wasberg and Michael Davis-Hall, Assistants, for respondent. \[As amended by order of the Supreme Court January 27, 1995…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Leren v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2019)
…and, read together, properly inform the jury of the applicable law.\[100\] As a general matter, the superseding cause theory applies to product liability actions.\[101\] If an employer's conduct is at issue, failure to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Ulbricht v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (2020)
…5; Resp. at 5-6.) At issue in both this action and the declaratory judgment action are five commercial general liability policies that the Ulbrichts allege USF&G issued to PM Northwest ("USF&G Policies"). (Compl…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…Technologies, L.L.C. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.); General Motors Corporation (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Harrison Thermal System and Harrison Radiator); Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Hardie-Tynes…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 18, 1989 · in the opinion
IN the Matter of Estate OF Foster (1989)
…Innes deposition testimony as a whole, therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing it as general background to the early production levels of the Owens-Illinois product. Affirmed. WINSOR, J., and DEIERLEIN…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Walston v. Boeing Company (2014)
…gross negligence, yet short of premeditated and deliberate harm). Our holding in Birklid interprets the intentional tort consistently with general tort principles while still keeping in mind the IIA's purpose of balancing competing interests. 127…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…b)(6) designees could not answer questions about the U.S. Navy's general knowledge of asbestos-related health hazards between 1968 and March 1974 (Topic 1); Harang Joseph Perkins' duties on the U.S.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)
…review and publication; (3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 11, 2011 · in the opinion
Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2011)
…BOILER COMPANY, a division of AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY COMPANY; TRICO CONTRACTING, INC., TRANSALTA CENTRALIA GENERATION, LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO.; WRIGHT SCHUCHART HARBOR CO., WEYERHAUSER COMPANY; ZURN INDUSTRIES LLC; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.;…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2023 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2023)
…engaged in the "ripout" or "tearout" of asbestos. The government fails to cite any authority for this proposition. It points to general studies, but does not demonstrate that Mr. Perkins did not "ripout" or "tearout" asbestos…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)
…102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982)). \[12\] The express reservation test is similar to the rule of general retroactivity discussed by this court in pre-Robinson decisions. Haines, 87 Wash.2d at…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)
…NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to GARLOCK, INC. and US GASKET CO.); GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARDIE-TYNES, LLC. (sued…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Coogan v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc. (2020)
…distribution." Id. at 148. Since Tabert, the court repeatedly has confirmed that as a general rule, strict products liability applies to all persons in the chain of distribution of a product. Macias, 175 Wn.2d at…