No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

163 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 9

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …review and publication; (3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 22, 1988 · in the opinion

    Millison v. EI du Pont de Nemours (1988)

    …Ed. 610, 617 (1939); U.S. v. Trotter, 529, F.2d 806 (3d Cir.1976); State v. General Restoration Co., 42 N.J. 366, 375 (1964); State v. Sherwin, 127 N.J. Super. 370 (App.Div…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)

    …the in limine motion \operate\[s\] as a general demurrer to \[the\] complaint or a motion for judgment on the pleadings.' \[Citations.\] \Alternatively,' where such motions are granted \at the outset of trial with reference to…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Epstein v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Corporation is directed to serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on all remaining parties, the Trial Support Clerk located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119), and on the County Clerk…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)

    …s defense depended on evidence of Johns-Manville's sophistication. "Although the record clearly show\[ed\] Johns-Manville was aware of the risks of asbestos in general, no evidence established it knew about the particularly acute…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …however, to the general rule that \"the voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a judgment or order is a bar to the prosecution of an appeal therefrom..." ... where the appellant's right to the accepted portion…

  7. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)

    …625 A.2d 1110). B. Applying those general principles of tort liability to the facts of this case, the risk of injury to someone like Eleanor Olivo is one that should have been foreseeable to Exxon…

  8. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982)). \[12\] The express reservation test is similar to the rule of general retroactivity discussed by this court in pre-Robinson decisions. Haines, 87 Wash.2d at…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …at 3. "In general, a premises owner has a duty of exercising reasonable care for the safety of persons on its premises and a duty of not exposing such persons to unreasonable risks of injury or…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    Flanders v. California Coastal Communities (2005)

    …There are, however, four exceptions to this general rule: "(1) where there is an express or implied agreement of assumption; (2) where the transaction amounts to a consolidation or merger of the purchaser or seller corporation;…

  11. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…

  12. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion

    Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)

    …Thereafter, the Court adopted the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 414 (1977) approach for imposing liability on a property owner or general contractor that controls the work of an independent contractor who is negligently injured. See Redinger…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …The "minimum contacts" prong of the test can be broken down into two types of personal jurisdiction, specific and general. A state exercises "specific jurisdiction" over a non-resident defendant when the lawsuit arises from or…

  14. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    …theory of non-identification liability is acceptable in New Jersey. \[9\] The court "reserve\[d\] decision on the general appropriateness of including products with different degrees of risk in a market-share analysis." 116 N.J…

  15. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 10, 2010 · in the opinion

    Simpkins v. CSX Corp. (2010)

    …required the New Jersey Supreme Court to apply general principles of duty similar to Illinois's to circumstances nearly identical to those present in the instant case. Satterfield involved a 25-year-old woman who died…

  16. Court case · California Supreme Court · February 18, 2010 · in the opinion

    McCann v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2010)

    …law. Although section 361 provides that, in general, a cause of action arising in another state cannot be maintained in California if the other state's law bars the action due to a lapse of time…

  17. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kivell v. Murphy Oil USA (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …worked at Murphy while he was employed by Matthews McCraken Rutland ("MMR"), a subcontractor of the general contractor McDermott/Hudson Engineering. McDermott constructed the FCC Unit and Alkylation Unit in Area 4 of the Meraux refinery…

  18. Industry

    Asbestos Exposure in Refineries and Petrochemical Plants

    …85% Magnesia under sheet aluminum Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. Ehret ad, Asbestos, June 1955 Ferndale Mobilgas Refinery, General Petroleum Corp., Wash. 1957 85% Magnesia and calcium silicate on the catalytic cracking unit E. J. Bartell Co…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion

    Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)

    …Judge Robreno because regardless of what causation standard applies, it is a general principle of Alabama tort law that the plaintiff bears the burden of submitting evidence proving that the defendant caused his injuries. See Turner…

  20. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)

    …In New Jersey, however, the common law of premises liability "has undergone transition toward \a broadening application of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.'" Sussman, supra, 373 N.J…