No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

121 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 7

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …he performed automotive repairs and, from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, he used brakes from Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Pep Boys, and NAPA stores. Deposition of Jon Burger, dated 3/29/06…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ballard v. Anchor Packing Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2009)

    …and floor tilers, pipe fitters, boiler workers, and electrician. Robert Killenberger Mr. Robert Killenberger recently died from mesothelioma at the age of 65. Mr. Killenberger was allegedly exposed to asbestos primarily from the variety of jobs…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Alder v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …old and is living with mesothelioma (see Aff in Supp., Exhibit J). Mr. Conaway served as both a Naval and civilian electrician for several decades (Aff in Supp., Exh J at 39-40, 54, 78-79…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2014

    Horvath v. Acf Indus., LLC (2014)

    …signal inspector. Mr. Horvath also testified that, as a signal engineer for General Railway Signal, he was exposed over several months to asbestos from wires, cables and signal components on New York City subway projects. CSX…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Gill v. Pacor, Inc. (1982)

    …services, society. These are the things that are encompassed in the general description or the technical word that we use as "consortium." That is the nature of Mrs. Gill's claim; that by virtue of the…

  7. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    CSX Transp., Inc. v. Hensley (2009)

    …absent evidence that the fear was genuine and serious. Both courts affirmed decisions to reject genuine-and-serious instructions and to rely instead on general pain-and-suffering instructions to charge the jury. In so doing…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Hunter (2005)

    …the integrity of our proper role, vis a vis, the General Assembly. We explain. Maryland's cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury or wrongful death actions is codified at Md.Code (1998 Repl.Vol.), Cts…

  9. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion

    Burkhart v. HJ Heinz Co. (2013)

    …pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment. {¶ 49} The trial court's decision here is somewhat perplexing. The letter…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion

    Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Company (2007)

    …of Mr. Gregg's exposure concretely, he maintains that the more general references in the testimony are circumstantial evidence that Mr. Gregg performed brake changes with asbestos-containing products from Appellant's store more frequently. Further…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993 · in the opinion

    Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)

    …1094 (1991). Appellees acknowledge this general pronouncement of law but contend that retroactive application should only occur when the issue at the center of the change in law has been properly preserved for review. Certainly appellants…

  12. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court · March 8, 1985 · in the opinion

    Devlin v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)

    … 26, provides that the general rules against claim splitting are rendered inapplicable when: (b) The court in the first action has expressly reserved the plaintiff's right to maintain the second action or; (f) it is…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion

    Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2005)

    …for the following reasons. The general prescription articles in Louisiana simply do not contemplate interruption of prescription by the filing in a court of competent jurisdiction and venue a lawsuit that is premature because it is…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · September 4, 1991 · in the opinion

    O'brien v. National Gypsum Co. (1991)

    …any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence. However…

  15. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion

    Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)

    …Rather, defendants state, the cost "will be borne by the public at large and reflected in a general, across the board increase in premiums to compensate for unanticipated risks." There is some truth in this assertion…

  16. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 26, 1993 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Keene Corp. (1993)

    …there is no common experience on which we can premise the creation of a presumption that the general public reads and heeds warnings. [\597] We can agree with defendant that the heeding presumption is not firmly…

  17. Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · October 15, 1986 · in the opinion

    Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …is an important limitation of the seller's liability. In general, "\[t\]he rule of strict liability subjects the seller to liability to [\540] the user or consumer even though he has exercised all possible care…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion

    Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …69-70, 286 N.E.2d 454 (1972). See Barkanic v. General Admin. of Civil Aviation of the People's Republic of China, 923 F.2d 957, 963 (2d Cir.1991) (stating that New York courts…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …that courts consider whether the party seeking the withdrawal or amendment has acted with due diligence. In more general terms, courts should seek to ascertain whether the aggrieved party was careless in not timely filing its…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…