138 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 7
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…awards for wrongful death and pain and suffering deviate materially from reasonable compensation. C — After remitting the verdict, the jury's award must be reduced by offsets pursuant to General Obligations Law § 15-108. These errors…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)
…should be held strictly liable for the injuries that Brunet sustained. The trial court did not err in awarding Brunet $250,000 in general damages. I do not believe that the award is beyond that which…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)
…Waterloo, for appellees. [\62] Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Richard E. Mull, Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor-appellee. [\61] CADY, Chief Justice. In this case, we are called upon to review numerous issues that arose…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC (2015)
…factual support for elements essential to the plaintiffs' negligence and strict liability claims. Even considering the general duty owed by premises owners, Jordan's deposition does not address or provide factual support to show that PCC…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Hellam v. Crane Co. (2014)
…General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at p. 566.) This test "is not necessarily foreclosed simply because the product at issue is only in specialized use, so that the general public may not be familiar…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…not prove that he presently suffers from that disease. In arguing that the cancer evidence was properly admissible, Jackson relies on the general rule of tort law that allows for recovery of all harms — past, present…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · March 24, 1983 · in the opinion
Asbestos Insul. Co. v. Wcab (McGOVERN) (1983)
…the fact that Mr. McGovern was exposed to asbestos in this short period of time that you mentioned might probably have aggravated his general pulmonary status because of being exposed to the offending agent. You see…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Henry Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…4 at 29:25-30:4). Plaintiffs then go on to show that in Henry's general catalog and Henry's commercial products catalog, it states that Henry did produce and manufacture asbestos-containing plastic roof…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)
…We hold that the general rule that there is no duty under common law products liability or negligence principles to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products applies with regard to…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion
Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)
…In New Jersey, however, the common law of premises liability "has undergone transition toward \a broadening application of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.'" Sussman, supra, 373 N.J…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 4, 2016 · in the opinion
North v. National Grid Generation (IN the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…46 AD3d 268 \[1st Dept 2007\]). The clause in the contract between LILCO and O'Connor (which predates the enactment of General Obligations Law § 5-322.1) provided for indemnification of LILCO by O'Connor for…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 30, 1985 · in the opinion
Martin v. American Petrofina, Inc. (1985)
…Anderson, the insulation contractor, testified that as a general rule, a mastics insulation job could be expected to last five to ten years before it began to break down by becoming brittle and cracking. D.A…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Botta v. AERCO Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…1st Dept. 1984\]). Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D. 81, 38…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Watts v. A & J Plumbing & Heating Corp. (2018)
…1985 APA in existence before the closing date. The RAL Corporation, RAL Leasing & Credit Corporation and RAL Plumbing and Heating Supply, Inc. retained their product liability and comprehensive general liability insurance policies (Mot. Exh. 5, para. …
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)
…1995), trans. denied. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within ten years after the delivery of the product to the initial user or consumer…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Mrjaj v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)
…He further testified the International Chimney that was "in existence at that time" was the general contractor and performed the work on furnace number 4 in 1957 at Hanna Furnaces (NYSEF Doc 457 pages 137-145…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)
…support a jury conclusion that W&G was the primary insulation contractor working at LRHS. This is not a case in which evidence was presented showing the general presence of asbestos-containing products at LRHS. Accordingly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion
Cunningham v. Aerco Intl. (2017)
…generally that the law of different jurisdictions may apply, absent any analysis with respect to this issue, such general statement is an insufficient basis to deny consolidation. However, this determination does not preclude the parties from…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · August 16, 2005 · in the opinion
Payne v. Charlotte Heating & Air Cond. (2005)
…silicosis and other latent occupational diseases and we can conceive of none. As [\363] was true in Walters, the general goals articulated by defendants for the statute are legitimate state interests, but N.C. Gen.Stat…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)
… 388 (1965), observing that the section had previously been adopted as a general principle in the duty to warn area by previous Maryland cases. Section 388 states as follows: Chattel Known to Be Dangerous for Intended…