178 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 9
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 5, 2005
Snyder v. Ford Motor Co. (2005)
…reversed the May 2005 summary judgment for Ford, General Dynamics and the Administrator, and remanded for a determination of her right to participate in the workers' compensation fund. To participate in the workers' compensation fund for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 21, 2024
Pike v. Dempster Industries, Inc. (2024)
…general expert evidence that every exposure contributes does not satisfy it. Without compensatory liability, punitive damages fail. Causation; Product Identification; Punitive Damages; Choice of Law; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: General Fertilizer Equipment (Speedy Spread); General…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 6, 2010
Stewart v. AO Smith Water Products (2010)
…attenuated and speculative. Product Identification; Failure to Warn; The Bare-Metal Defense Worksites: General Motors Ypsilanti plant; General Motors Ypsilanti, Michigan Plant, Ypsilanti worker repairing valves and machines General Motors Ypsilanti, Michigan Plant Ypsilanti 1975-2005
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 10, 2018
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)
…a pathologist's tissue analysis, an occupational physician's exposure opinions, a scientist's general testimony on how asbestos causes disease, a historian's account of what was known about asbestos hazards, and studies and videos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 12, 2010
McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp. (2010)
…for its subsidiary's acts absent alter-ego control or proof that it assumed a duty of workplace safety, and general safety oversight and correspondence do not show such an assumption. Premises Owner Liability; Successor Liability…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…for hazards faced by an independent contractor's employee unless it actively controlled the manner and method of the work, and general superintendence is not enough. DP&L did not actively control the work at Edgemoor…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020
Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)
…Schrader prevailed on that point. A trial court abuses its discretion when it denies a jury's specific request to view a duly admitted exhibit based only on a general preference and speculation about prolonged deliberations…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993
Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)
…had worked at the plant for sixteen to twenty-three years between 1956 and 1979. Most were general tireworkers who did not handle the products. The complaint and the doctors' testimony said the workers had asbestosis…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 29, 2017
Walsh v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…was a substantial factor in causing the injury. The court found the Walshes' evidence did not support that inference and that they were stretching general testimony about replacement parts. Because they bore the burden of proof…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 20, 2012
Bischofsberger v. AO Smith Water Products (2012)
…time of exposure, disease, discovery status and counsel. It found that the cases shared only general testimony on asbestos science, state of the art and the nature of mesothelioma. They had different exposure periods, different types…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 29, 1993
Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1993)
…It upheld exclusion of a treating doctor's deposition because the Angelos had not shown diligent efforts to secure his attendance. It found the reverse bifurcation proper, and the jury instructions and general verdict form adequate.
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 1990
Uram v. Abex Corp. (1990)
…run long before 1987. For Virginia's consortium claim, the court applied the general one-year statute with a discovery rule. It found she should likewise have suspected the cause in 1976, so her claim was…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion
Hebert v. Anco Insulation, Inc. (2002)
…Ed.2d 379 (1994). Only if the appellate court finds an abuse of that discretion may it examine prior awards of general damages to determine the amount the trier of fact reasonable could award. Theriot v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Amdura (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
Pruitt perform general maintenance on these pumps every one to two months, which required removing and replacing gaskets and packing material. (Id.) Mr. Dumas further testified that Mr. Pruitt's maintenance work took two to three…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc. (2019)
51, 51-52 (2008) ("Beyond general and specific causation, an additional causation issue arises when multiple defendants are responsible for exposing the plaintiff to a harmful substance. The most common example is a plaintiff who contracts…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
There the canon avoids not contradiction but the superfluity of a specific provision that is swallowed by the general one, "violat\[ing\] the cardinal rule that, if possible, effect shall be given to every clause and…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Clevenger v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
Marchevsky's answered: So basically as we put in the guidelines, in general, it's difficult to tell a sarcoma mesothelioma from other tumors, which is why we went through the trouble of putting together the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 18, 2008 · in the opinion
Pantalone v. Aurora Pump Co. (2008)
…and which were purportedly critical to the removal determination), Buffalo Pumps instead proffered its factual basis for removal in broad, general terms. According to the notice, Buffalo Pumps had satisfied the statutory requirements for removal during…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Rehm v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
…Daubert rubric." Id. Dr. Morgan reviewed two articles detailing studies which had concluded that elevator mechanics carry a greater risk of developing asbestos-related diseases than the general population. He further recounted that it was established…