228 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 12
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Casey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. (2016)
…the following information: a. Proffered Opinion Mr. van der Bogert was given a "pretty general, broad" task: "Read the testimony and form an opinion relative to the interactions or potential interactions between, in this case specifically…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Christy v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993 · in the opinion
Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)
…1094 (1991). Appellees acknowledge this general pronouncement of law but contend that retroactive application should only occur when the issue at the center of the change in law has been properly preserved for review. Certainly appellants…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion
Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)
…Rather, defendants state, the cost "will be borne by the public at large and reflected in a general, across the board increase in premiums to compensate for unanticipated risks." There is some truth in this assertion…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion
ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003
Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)
…Sparrows Point plant (steel mill); General Motors plant, Halethorpe; Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point, Sparrows Point; General Motors plant, Halethorpe, Halethorpe pipe fitter Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point Sparrows Point 1946-1979; warehouseman General Motors plant, Halethorpe Halethorpe
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012
Casey v. Perini Corporation (2012)
The Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for general contractor Perini Corporation against plaintiffs Patricia and John Casey, holding the trial court properly excluded plaintiffs' expert declaration and that plaintiffs offered only speculation about exposure. An…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009
Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)
…Texas City; Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City, Texas City pipefitter and general laborer Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 2, 2018
Fagot v. Dow Chemical Company (2018)
…employers, contractors and premises owners, claiming he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working as a pipefitter/welder. Turner was a general contractor at Honeywell's Geismar, Louisiana facility. Fagot settled his claims against Honeywell. Honeywell…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 25, 2014
Ehlert v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2014)
…liability does not apply. A trial court does not abuse its discretion by giving a general negligence instruction or excluding newspaper articles not shown to be relevant to the defendant's knowledge. Expert Testimony; Failure to…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 14, 2020
Adams v. Ethyl Corporation (2020)
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment for the Gaddy children against Ethyl Corporation, including the reduction of general damages to $3,000,000, and rejected both Ethyl's challenges and the plaintiffs' challenge to the jury…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 2, 2008
Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)
…cut and sawed insulation, and dust fell on him. The judge awarded $2.8 million in general damages and $402,000 in special damages. He divided fault into equal shares among eight wrongdoers, so each of…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 3, 2023
Walker v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)
…After a seven-day trial, the jury awarded about $36.76 million in total damages, most of it general damages. The trial court held Level 3 liable for 11/21 virile shares, a judgment of $19…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 23, 2013
McCloskey v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2013)
…cut and punched gaskets from sheets stamped "Goodyear", which created dust, and that he believed they contained asbestos because he was told so and it was general knowledge. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada, Inc…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 30, 2004
Clephas v. Garlock, Inc. (2004)
…testified that Charles had no asbestosis and no asbestos-caused condition. Garlock's pre-trial disclosure of him was only a general statement of subjects, and he was never made available for deposition despite a court…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · September 30, 2013
Cary v. American Optical Corporation (2013)
…Watts moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Cary conceded there was no general jurisdiction but argued for specific jurisdiction and asked for more discovery. The court found it unclear whether Watts had purposely directed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020
Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)
…a jury found Ethyl, International Paper and Owens-Illinois liable. It awarded $7.5 million in general damages plus $250,661.45 in medical expenses. Judgment against Ethyl was $2,583,553.82, its share after…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 19, 2014
Luna v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…not show which products were present when Mr. Luna's exposure began in 1963. It upheld the general damages given his pain and decline. It removed the court costs, as the siblings agreed the hospital could…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…court found no evidence that Emhart's distillers contained asbestos or that Emhart supplied asbestos replacement parts, since the plaintiffs relied on general expert statements about what manufacturers typically did. Griscom-Russell had dissolved in 1962…